4 Top Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
If you’re looking for steady income, dividend stocks are a…
Sell
39
QQH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$66.04
Seasonality move
:
-0.45%
Day range:
$65.71 - $66.91
52-week range:
$49.18 - $72.02
Dividend yield:
0.24%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
19.1K
Avg. volume:
29.4K
1-year change:
33.29%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PWB
Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QGRW
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
$66.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.24% | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
$101.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 0.43% | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
$398.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 0.46% | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
$75.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 0.66% | -- |
|
PWB
Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF
|
$101.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.08% | -- |
|
QGRW
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund
|
$48.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.14% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | 1.259 | -- | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.023 | -- | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
-- | 1.006 | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | 0.995 | -- | -- |
|
PWB
Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.211 | -- | -- |
|
QGRW
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund
|
-- | 1.087 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PWB
Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QGRW
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns QQH or IVW?
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net margin of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QQH or IVW?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF, analysts believe HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is more attractive than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is QQH or IVW More Risky?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.017, which suggesting that the stock is 1.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.912%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QQH or IVW?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QQH or IVW?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -- IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QQH or IWF?
iShares Russell 1000 Growth has a net margin of -- compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net margin of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Russell 1000 Growth's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QQH or IWF?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Russell 1000 Growth has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Russell 1000 Growth, analysts believe HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Russell 1000 Growth.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth0 0 0 -
Is QQH or IWF More Risky?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.017, which suggesting that the stock is 1.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Russell 1000 Growth has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.192%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QQH or IWF?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. iShares Russell 1000 Growth offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Russell 1000 Growth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QQH or IWF?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Russell 1000 Growth quarterly revenues of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Russell 1000 Growth's net income of --. Notably, HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Russell 1000 Growth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Russell 1000 Growth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -- IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QQH or ONEQ?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net margin of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QQH or ONEQ?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, analysts believe HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is QQH or ONEQ More Risky?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.017, which suggesting that the stock is 1.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.104, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.37%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QQH or ONEQ?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QQH or ONEQ?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -- ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QQH or PWB?
Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net margin of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- PWBInvesco Large Cap Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QQH or PWB?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF, analysts believe HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is more attractive than Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 PWBInvesco Large Cap Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is QQH or PWB More Risky?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.017, which suggesting that the stock is 1.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.393%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QQH or PWB?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QQH or PWB?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -- PWBInvesco Large Cap Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QQH or QGRW?
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund has a net margin of -- compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net margin of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- QGRWWisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QQH or QGRW?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund, analysts believe HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF0 0 0 QGRWWisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund0 0 0 -
Is QQH or QGRW More Risky?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a beta of 1.017, which suggesting that the stock is 1.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QQH or QGRW?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QQH or QGRW?
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund quarterly revenues of --. HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund's net income of --. Notably, HCM Defender 100 Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QQHHCM Defender 100 Index ETF-- -- -- -- QGRWWisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Uber Stock Recover?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have had a rough few…
Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 114x
Sell
39
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
87
CEG alert for Jan 11
Constellation Energy [CEG] is up 25.15% over the past day.
Sell
1
MCY alert for Jan 11
Mercury General [MCY] is down 19.87% over the past day.
Buy
84
ATZAF alert for Jan 11
Aritzia [ATZAF] is up 17.63% over the past day.
