Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Buy
81
FNGU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$665.50
Seasonality move
:
26.15%
Day range:
$646.83 - $666.00
52-week range:
$204.92 - $697.87
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
363.4K
Avg. volume:
749.3K
1-year change:
183.97%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN
|
$666.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
|
$196.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 0.72% | -- |
|
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
|
$100.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
$116.54 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.24% | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
$88.44 | -- | -- | -- | $0.28 | 1.14% | -- |
|
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
|
$70.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.09% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | 3.549 | -- | -- |
|
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
|
-- | 2.347 | -- | -- |
|
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | 2.302 | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | 2.258 | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | 3.445 | -- | -- |
|
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
|
-- | 3.754 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FNGU or FNGG?
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- FNGGDirexion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FNGU or FNGG?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares, analysts believe MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN is more attractive than Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 FNGGDirexion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares0 0 0 -
Is FNGU or FNGG More Risky?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 3.699, which suggesting that the stock is 269.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNGU or FNGG?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNGU or FNGG?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- FNGGDirexion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FNGU or FNGO?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- FNGOMicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FNGU or FNGO?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN, analysts believe MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN is more attractive than MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 FNGOMicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 -
Is FNGU or FNGO More Risky?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 3.699, which suggesting that the stock is 269.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 2.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 141.834%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNGU or FNGO?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNGU or FNGO?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- FNGOMicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FNGU or QLD?
ProShares Ultra QQQ has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra QQQ's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- QLDProShares Ultra QQQ-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FNGU or QLD?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra QQQ has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra QQQ, analysts believe MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN is more attractive than ProShares Ultra QQQ.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 QLDProShares Ultra QQQ0 0 0 -
Is FNGU or QLD More Risky?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 3.699, which suggesting that the stock is 269.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra QQQ has a beta of 2.240, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.995%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNGU or QLD?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProShares Ultra QQQ offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra QQQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNGU or QLD?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra QQQ quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra QQQ's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra QQQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra QQQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- QLDProShares Ultra QQQ-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FNGU or TQQQ?
ProShares UltraPro QQQ has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraPro QQQ's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FNGU or TQQQ?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraPro QQQ has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraPro QQQ, analysts believe MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN is more attractive than ProShares UltraPro QQQ.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ0 0 0 -
Is FNGU or TQQQ More Risky?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 3.699, which suggesting that the stock is 269.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraPro QQQ has a beta of 3.412, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 241.173%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNGU or TQQQ?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProShares UltraPro QQQ offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraPro QQQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNGU or TQQQ?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraPro QQQ quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraPro QQQ's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraPro QQQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraPro QQQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FNGU or USD?
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra Semiconductors's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- USDProShares Ultra Semiconductors-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FNGU or USD?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra Semiconductors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra Semiconductors, analysts believe MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN is more attractive than ProShares Ultra Semiconductors.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 USDProShares Ultra Semiconductors0 0 0 -
Is FNGU or USD More Risky?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 3.699, which suggesting that the stock is 269.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra Semiconductors has a beta of 2.765, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.475%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNGU or USD?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProShares Ultra Semiconductors offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra Semiconductors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNGU or USD?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra Semiconductors quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra Semiconductors's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- USDProShares Ultra Semiconductors-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.
