Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…
Sell
35
FLHK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$16.58
Seasonality move
:
-1.15%
Day range:
$16.76 - $16.80
52-week range:
$15.41 - $21.03
Dividend yield:
4.61%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.3K
Avg. volume:
19.4K
1-year change:
-3.16%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
$16.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 4.61% | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
$16.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 4.32% | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
$19.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 5.32% | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
$29.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.45 | 1.82% | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
$19.71 | -- | -- | -- | $0.48 | 2.43% | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
$26.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 1.278 | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 1.286 | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 0.886 | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | 1.187 | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | 1.347 | -- | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KCAI
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FLHK or EWH?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLHK or EWH?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLHK or EWH More Risky?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.69% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.870, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.958%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLHK or EWH?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.61%. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 4.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLHK or EWH?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLHK or FCA?
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLHK or FCA?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is FLHK or FCA More Risky?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.69% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 0.818, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.237%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLHK or FCA?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.61%. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 5.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLHK or FCA?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLHK or FXI?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLHK or FXI?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares China Large-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than iShares China Large-Cap ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLHK or FXI More Risky?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.69% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.755%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLHK or FXI?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.61%. iShares China Large-Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLHK or FXI?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares China Large-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for iShares China Large-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLHK or KALL?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLHK or KALL?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLHK or KALL More Risky?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.69% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.612%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLHK or KALL?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.61%. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLHK or KALL?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLHK or KCAI?
KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net margin of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- KCAIKraneShares China Alpha Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLHK or KCAI?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF, analysts believe Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is more attractive than KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 KCAIKraneShares China Alpha Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLHK or KCAI More Risky?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.69% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLHK or KCAI?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.61%. KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLHK or KCAI?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -- KCAIKraneShares China Alpha Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Marvell Stock Up?
Semiconductor and data infrastructure company Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) absolutely trounced…
Why Is General Electric Stock Going Up?
General Electric Company, doing business these days as GE Aerospace…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
44
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 10
IonQ [IONQ] is up 7.07% over the past day.
Sell
47
CEG alert for Jan 10
Constellation Energy [CEG] is up 25.15% over the past day.
Sell
8
CRNX alert for Jan 10
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals [CRNX] is down 16.31% over the past day.
