Is Revolve Group Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Recently, Revolve Group (NYSE:RVLV) management delivered some fairly positive business…
Sell
35
CMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$54.64
Seasonality move
:
0.21%
Day range:
$54.01 - $54.73
52-week range:
$53.61 - $58.18
Dividend yield:
2.98%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
884K
Avg. volume:
803K
1-year change:
-3.56%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMF
iShares California Muni Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUB
iShares National Muni Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMF
iShares California Muni Bond ETF
|
$54.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 2.98% | -- |
|
MUB
iShares National Muni Bond ETF
|
$102.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.28 | 3.18% | -- |
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
$10.25 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 5.97% | -- |
|
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
$10.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 7.93% | -- |
|
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
|
$22.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 3.55% | -- |
|
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF
|
$48.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 3.31% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMF
iShares California Muni Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.886 | -- | -- |
|
MUB
iShares National Muni Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.923 | -- | -- |
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
-- | 2.390 | -- | -- |
|
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | 1.908 | -- | -- |
|
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 1.131 | -- | -- |
|
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF
|
-- | 0.937 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMF
iShares California Muni Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUB
iShares National Muni Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NAC
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares California Muni Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CMF or MUB?
iShares National Muni Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares California Muni Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares California Muni Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares National Muni Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- MUBiShares National Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CMF or MUB?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares National Muni Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares California Muni Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares National Muni Bond ETF, analysts believe iShares California Muni Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares National Muni Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF0 0 0 MUBiShares National Muni Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is CMF or MUB More Risky?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares National Muni Bond ETF has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.174%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMF or MUB?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.98%. iShares National Muni Bond ETF offers a yield of 3.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. iShares California Muni Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares National Muni Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMF or MUB?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares National Muni Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares California Muni Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares National Muni Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares California Muni Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares National Muni Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares California Muni Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares National Muni Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MUBiShares National Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CMF or MUC?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a net margin of -- compared to iShares California Muni Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares California Muni Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CMF or MUC?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares California Muni Bond ETF has higher upside potential than BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, analysts believe iShares California Muni Bond ETF is more attractive than BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF0 0 0 MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund0 0 0 -
Is CMF or MUC More Risky?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 2.332, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.162%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMF or MUC?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.98%. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund offers a yield of 5.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. iShares California Muni Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMF or MUC?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund quarterly revenues of --. iShares California Muni Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net income of --. Notably, iShares California Muni Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares California Muni Bond ETF is -- versus -- for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CMF or NAC?
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to iShares California Muni Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares California Muni Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- NACNuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CMF or NAC?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares California Muni Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund, analysts believe iShares California Muni Bond ETF is more attractive than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF0 0 0 NACNuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is CMF or NAC More Risky?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 2.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.346%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMF or NAC?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.98%. Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund offers a yield of 7.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. iShares California Muni Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMF or NAC?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. iShares California Muni Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, iShares California Muni Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares California Muni Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- -- NACNuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CMF or PWZ?
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares California Muni Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares California Muni Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CMF or PWZ?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares California Muni Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe iShares California Muni Bond ETF is more attractive than Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF0 0 0 PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is CMF or PWZ More Risky?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.369%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMF or PWZ?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.98%. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. iShares California Muni Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMF or PWZ?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares California Muni Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares California Muni Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares California Muni Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- -- PWZInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CMF or VTEB?
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares California Muni Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares California Muni Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- VTEBVanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CMF or VTEB?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares California Muni Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF, analysts believe iShares California Muni Bond ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF0 0 0 VTEBVanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is CMF or VTEB More Risky?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.403%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMF or VTEB?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.98%. Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. iShares California Muni Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMF or VTEB?
iShares California Muni Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares California Muni Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares California Muni Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares California Muni Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF-- -- -- -- VTEBVanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Bloom Energy Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
While already interesting as the world moves toward greener energy…
What Do Tesla Delivery Numbers Mean for Tesla Stock?
Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) released Q1 delivery numbers, showing a substantial slowdown…
Stock Ideas
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 29.14% over the past day.
Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 12
Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 26.73% over the past day.
Buy
89
GDXU alert for Apr 12
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 15.9% over the past day.
