ZETA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DoubleVerify Holdings has a net margin of -6.48% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of 10.74%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -49.55% beat DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 6.09%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.54, signalling upside risk potential of 97.78%. On the other hand DoubleVerify Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.80 which suggests that it could grow by 17.22%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoubleVerify Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoubleVerify Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $268.3M, which are larger than DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues of $169.6M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$17.4M is lower than DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $18.2M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DoubleVerify Holdings's PE ratio is 52.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 3.69x versus 5.34x for DoubleVerify Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HubSpot has a net margin of -6.48% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of 1.22%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -49.55% beat HubSpot's return on equity of -1.68%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.54, signalling upside risk potential of 97.78%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $735.94 which suggests that it could grow by 3.99%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.701, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.092%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $268.3M, which are smaller than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $669.7M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$17.4M is lower than HubSpot's net income of $8.1M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HubSpot's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 3.69x versus 14.45x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UiPath has a net margin of -6.48% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -3%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -49.55% beat UiPath's return on equity of -4.78%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.54, signalling upside risk potential of 97.78%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $15.73 which suggests that it could grow by 13.88%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than UiPath.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $268.3M, which are smaller than UiPath quarterly revenues of $354.7M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$17.4M is lower than UiPath's net income of -$10.7M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 3.69x versus 5.52x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PubMatic has a net margin of -6.48% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -1.27%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -49.55% beat PubMatic's return on equity of 6.1%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.54, signalling upside risk potential of 97.78%. On the other hand PubMatic has an analysts' consensus of $20.11 which suggests that it could grow by 31.19%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than PubMatic, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than PubMatic.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PubMatic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PubMatic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $268.3M, which are larger than PubMatic quarterly revenues of $71.8M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$17.4M is lower than PubMatic's net income of -$912K. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PubMatic's PE ratio is 49.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 3.69x versus 2.94x for PubMatic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.