UWMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mr. Cooper Group has a net margin of 2.65% compared to UWM Holdings's net margin of 23.45%. UWM Holdings's return on equity of 0.63% beat Mr. Cooper Group's return on equity of 14.72%.

UWM Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.97, signalling upside risk potential of 22.97%. On the other hand Mr. Cooper Group has an analysts' consensus of $126.63 which suggests that it could grow by 17.65%. Given that UWM Holdings has higher upside potential than Mr. Cooper Group, analysts believe UWM Holdings is more attractive than Mr. Cooper Group.

UWM Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mr. Cooper Group has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.407%.

UWM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.06%. Mr. Cooper Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UWM Holdings pays 275.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Mr. Cooper Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings quarterly revenues are $336.3M, which are smaller than Mr. Cooper Group quarterly revenues of $870M. UWM Holdings's net income of $8.9M is lower than Mr. Cooper Group's net income of $204M. Notably, UWM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.88x while Mr. Cooper Group's PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings is 1.95x versus 2.34x for Mr. Cooper Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Onity Group has a net margin of 2.65% compared to UWM Holdings's net margin of -11.08%. UWM Holdings's return on equity of 0.63% beat Onity Group's return on equity of 7.56%.

UWM Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.97, signalling upside risk potential of 22.97%. On the other hand Onity Group has an analysts' consensus of $43.75 which suggests that it could grow by 34.86%. Given that Onity Group has higher upside potential than UWM Holdings, analysts believe Onity Group is more attractive than UWM Holdings.

UWM Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Onity Group has a beta of 1.984, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.408%.

UWM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.06%. Onity Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UWM Holdings pays 275.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Onity Group pays out 1.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Onity Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UWM Holdings's is not.

UWM Holdings quarterly revenues are $336.3M, which are larger than Onity Group quarterly revenues of $253.6M. UWM Holdings's net income of $8.9M is higher than Onity Group's net income of -$28.1M. Notably, UWM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.88x while Onity Group's PE ratio is 8.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings is 1.95x versus 0.25x for Onity Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Velocity Financial has a net margin of 2.65% compared to UWM Holdings's net margin of 32.36%. UWM Holdings's return on equity of 0.63% beat Velocity Financial's return on equity of 14.4%.

UWM Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.97, signalling upside risk potential of 22.97%. On the other hand Velocity Financial has an analysts' consensus of $21.75 which suggests that it could grow by 16.19%. Given that UWM Holdings has higher upside potential than Velocity Financial, analysts believe UWM Holdings is more attractive than Velocity Financial.

UWM Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Velocity Financial has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.445%.

UWM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.06%. Velocity Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UWM Holdings pays 275.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Velocity Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings quarterly revenues are $336.3M, which are larger than Velocity Financial quarterly revenues of $63.6M. UWM Holdings's net income of $8.9M is lower than Velocity Financial's net income of $20.6M. Notably, UWM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.88x while Velocity Financial's PE ratio is 9.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings is 1.95x versus 3.16x for Velocity Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walker & Dunlop has a net margin of 2.65% compared to UWM Holdings's net margin of 13.13%. UWM Holdings's return on equity of 0.63% beat Walker & Dunlop's return on equity of 6.2%.

UWM Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.97, signalling upside risk potential of 22.97%. On the other hand Walker & Dunlop has an analysts' consensus of $108.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.23%. Given that Walker & Dunlop has higher upside potential than UWM Holdings, analysts believe Walker & Dunlop is more attractive than UWM Holdings.

UWM Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walker & Dunlop has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.531%.

UWM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.06%. Walker & Dunlop offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. UWM Holdings pays 275.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop pays out 81.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UWM Holdings's is not.

UWM Holdings quarterly revenues are $336.3M, which are smaller than Walker & Dunlop quarterly revenues of $341.5M. UWM Holdings's net income of $8.9M is lower than Walker & Dunlop's net income of $44.8M. Notably, UWM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.88x while Walker & Dunlop's PE ratio is 26.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings is 1.95x versus 2.51x for Walker & Dunlop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.