TNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 2.01% compared to Tennant's net margin of 8.2%. Tennant's return on equity of 13.54% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9%.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $129.33, signalling upside risk potential of 57.78%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $257.58 which suggests that it could grow by 21.54%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than L3Harris Technologies, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than L3Harris Technologies.

Tennant has a beta of 1.017, which suggesting that the stock is 1.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.218%.

Tennant has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Tennant pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tennant quarterly revenues are $328.9M, which are smaller than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Tennant's net income of $6.6M is lower than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M. Notably, Tennant's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.71x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 26.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tennant is 1.22x versus 1.89x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Megola has a net margin of 2.01% compared to Tennant's net margin of --. Tennant's return on equity of 13.54% beat Megola's return on equity of --.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $129.33, signalling upside risk potential of 57.78%. On the other hand Megola has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Megola, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Megola.

Tennant has a beta of 1.017, which suggesting that the stock is 1.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Megola has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.548%.

Tennant has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Megola offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tennant pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Megola pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tennant quarterly revenues are $328.9M, which are larger than Megola quarterly revenues of --. Tennant's net income of $6.6M is higher than Megola's net income of --. Notably, Tennant's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.71x while Megola's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tennant is 1.22x versus -- for Megola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Megatech has a net margin of 2.01% compared to Tennant's net margin of --. Tennant's return on equity of 13.54% beat Megatech's return on equity of --.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $129.33, signalling upside risk potential of 57.78%. On the other hand Megatech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Megatech, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Megatech.

Tennant has a beta of 1.017, which suggesting that the stock is 1.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Megatech has a beta of -0.576, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.635%.

Tennant has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Megatech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tennant pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Megatech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tennant quarterly revenues are $328.9M, which are larger than Megatech quarterly revenues of --. Tennant's net income of $6.6M is higher than Megatech's net income of --. Notably, Tennant's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.71x while Megatech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tennant is 1.22x versus -- for Megatech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Standex International has a net margin of 2.01% compared to Tennant's net margin of 0.45%. Tennant's return on equity of 13.54% beat Standex International's return on equity of 8.5%.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $129.33, signalling upside risk potential of 57.78%. On the other hand Standex International has an analysts' consensus of $220.80 which suggests that it could grow by 32.25%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Standex International, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Standex International.

Tennant has a beta of 1.017, which suggesting that the stock is 1.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standex International has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.042%.

Tennant has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Standex International offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Tennant pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Standex International pays out 19.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tennant quarterly revenues are $328.9M, which are larger than Standex International quarterly revenues of $189.8M. Tennant's net income of $6.6M is higher than Standex International's net income of $857K. Notably, Tennant's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.71x while Standex International's PE ratio is 36.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tennant is 1.22x versus 2.78x for Standex International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.