SVV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duluth Holdings has a net margin of -0.47% compared to Savers Value Village's net margin of -2.32%. Savers Value Village's return on equity of 7.1% beat Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -22.54%.

Savers Value Village has a consensus price target of $12.29, signalling upside risk potential of 77.8%. On the other hand Duluth Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could grow by 25%. Given that Savers Value Village has higher upside potential than Duluth Holdings, analysts believe Savers Value Village is more attractive than Duluth Holdings.

Savers Value Village has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.906%.

Savers Value Village has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Duluth Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Savers Value Village pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Duluth Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Savers Value Village quarterly revenues are $402M, which are larger than Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues of $241.3M. Savers Value Village's net income of -$1.9M is higher than Duluth Holdings's net income of -$5.6M. Notably, Savers Value Village's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.02x while Duluth Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Savers Value Village is 0.74x versus 0.12x for Duluth Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Etsy has a net margin of -0.47% compared to Savers Value Village's net margin of 15.24%. Savers Value Village's return on equity of 7.1% beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Savers Value Village has a consensus price target of $12.29, signalling upside risk potential of 77.8%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $58.75 which suggests that it could grow by 26.93%. Given that Savers Value Village has higher upside potential than Etsy, analysts believe Savers Value Village is more attractive than Etsy.

Savers Value Village has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 2.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.82%.

Savers Value Village has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Savers Value Village pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Savers Value Village quarterly revenues are $402M, which are smaller than Etsy quarterly revenues of $852.2M. Savers Value Village's net income of -$1.9M is lower than Etsy's net income of $129.9M. Notably, Savers Value Village's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.02x while Etsy's PE ratio is 19.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Savers Value Village is 0.74x versus 2.17x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of -0.47% compared to Savers Value Village's net margin of 1.62%. Savers Value Village's return on equity of 7.1% beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.53%.

Savers Value Village has a consensus price target of $12.29, signalling upside risk potential of 77.8%. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 480.27%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Savers Value Village, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Savers Value Village.

Savers Value Village has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.958%.

Savers Value Village has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 15.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Savers Value Village pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Savers Value Village quarterly revenues are $402M, which are larger than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.8M. Savers Value Village's net income of -$1.9M is lower than Natural Health Trends's net income of $176K. Notably, Savers Value Village's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.02x while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 82.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Savers Value Village is 0.74x versus 1.38x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of -0.47% compared to Savers Value Village's net margin of 6.27%. Savers Value Village's return on equity of 7.1% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 49.44%.

Savers Value Village has a consensus price target of $12.29, signalling upside risk potential of 77.8%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $58.22 which suggests that it could grow by 9.58%. Given that Savers Value Village has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply, analysts believe Savers Value Village is more attractive than Tractor Supply.

Savers Value Village has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.847, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.287%.

Savers Value Village has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Savers Value Village pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Savers Value Village quarterly revenues are $402M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Savers Value Village's net income of -$1.9M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $236.4M. Notably, Savers Value Village's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.02x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 26.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Savers Value Village is 0.74x versus 1.93x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.