RGA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

F&G Annuities & Life has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of -0.44%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.59% beat F&G Annuities & Life's return on equity of 0.37%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $255.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.14%. On the other hand F&G Annuities & Life has an analysts' consensus of $47.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.65%. Given that F&G Annuities & Life has higher upside potential than Reinsurance Group of America, analysts believe F&G Annuities & Life is more attractive than Reinsurance Group of America.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.879% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F&G Annuities & Life has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. F&G Annuities & Life offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 24.28% of its earnings as a dividend. F&G Annuities & Life pays out -174.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than F&G Annuities & Life quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $156M is higher than F&G Annuities & Life's net income of -$6M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.84x while F&G Annuities & Life's PE ratio is 18.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.67x versus 0.91x for F&G Annuities & Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of -12.58%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.59% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 5.12%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $255.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.14%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.76%. Given that Lincoln National has higher upside potential than Reinsurance Group of America, analysts believe Lincoln National is more attractive than Reinsurance Group of America.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.879% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.788, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.845%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 5.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 24.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out -51.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $156M is higher than Lincoln National's net income of -$528M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.84x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 21.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.67x versus 0.38x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 21.23%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.59% beat Primerica's return on equity of 21.41%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $255.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.14%. On the other hand Primerica has an analysts' consensus of $314.83 which suggests that it could grow by 16%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Primerica, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Primerica.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.879% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.418%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Primerica offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 24.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Primerica quarterly revenues of $774.1M. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $156M is lower than Primerica's net income of $164.4M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.84x while Primerica's PE ratio is 20.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.67x versus 3.03x for Primerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Voya Financial has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 5.91%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.59% beat Voya Financial's return on equity of 11.8%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $255.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.14%. On the other hand Voya Financial has an analysts' consensus of $83.67 which suggests that it could grow by 26%. Given that Voya Financial has higher upside potential than Reinsurance Group of America, analysts believe Voya Financial is more attractive than Reinsurance Group of America.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.879% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Voya Financial has a beta of 1.050, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.981%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Voya Financial offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 24.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Voya Financial pays out 26.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Voya Financial quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $156M is higher than Voya Financial's net income of $114M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.84x while Voya Financial's PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.67x versus 0.89x for Voya Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.