PKE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CAM Group has a net margin of 10.95% compared to Park Aerospace's net margin of --. Park Aerospace's return on equity of 6.59% beat CAM Group's return on equity of --.

Park Aerospace has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 73.45%. On the other hand CAM Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than CAM Group, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than CAM Group.

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.431, which suggesting that the stock is 56.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CAM Group has a beta of -1.114, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.378%.

Park Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.34%. CAM Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park Aerospace pays 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend. CAM Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace quarterly revenues are $14.4M, which are larger than CAM Group quarterly revenues of --. Park Aerospace's net income of $1.6M is higher than CAM Group's net income of --. Notably, Park Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.64x while CAM Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace is 4.95x versus -- for CAM Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of 10.95% compared to Park Aerospace's net margin of 1.16%. Park Aerospace's return on equity of 6.59% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.24%.

Park Aerospace has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 73.45%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $30.64 which suggests that it could fall by -13.01%. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.431, which suggesting that the stock is 56.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.358%.

Park Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.34%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park Aerospace pays 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace quarterly revenues are $14.4M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $275.9M. Park Aerospace's net income of $1.6M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Park Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.64x while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 352.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace is 4.95x versus 4.55x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems has a net margin of 10.95% compared to Park Aerospace's net margin of -8.57%. Park Aerospace's return on equity of 6.59% beat Mercury Systems's return on equity of -7.95%.

Park Aerospace has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 73.45%. On the other hand Mercury Systems has an analysts' consensus of $35.75 which suggests that it could fall by -17.97%. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.431, which suggesting that the stock is 56.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.780, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.001%.

Park Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.34%. Mercury Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park Aerospace pays 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace quarterly revenues are $14.4M, which are smaller than Mercury Systems quarterly revenues of $204.4M. Park Aerospace's net income of $1.6M is higher than Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, Park Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.64x while Mercury Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace is 4.95x versus 2.94x for Mercury Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies has a net margin of 10.95% compared to Park Aerospace's net margin of -658%. Park Aerospace's return on equity of 6.59% beat Network-1 Technologies's return on equity of -3.88%.

Park Aerospace has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 73.45%. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies.

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.431, which suggesting that the stock is 56.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies has a beta of 0.122, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.81%.

Park Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.34%. Network-1 Technologies offers a yield of 7.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Park Aerospace pays 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies pays out -162.73% of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace quarterly revenues are $14.4M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies quarterly revenues of $100K. Park Aerospace's net income of $1.6M is higher than Network-1 Technologies's net income of -$316K. Notably, Park Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.64x while Network-1 Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace is 4.95x versus -- for Network-1 Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.