NWN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

New Jersey Resources has a net margin of 12.13% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 26.89%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 5.87% beat New Jersey Resources's return on equity of 15.21%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $46.80, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand New Jersey Resources has an analysts' consensus of $53.75 which suggests that it could grow by 12.4%. Given that Northwest Natural Holding has higher upside potential than New Jersey Resources, analysts believe Northwest Natural Holding is more attractive than New Jersey Resources.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.564, which suggesting that the stock is 43.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Jersey Resources has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.445%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.74%. New Jersey Resources offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. New Jersey Resources pays out 56.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $370.9M, which are smaller than New Jersey Resources quarterly revenues of $488.4M. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $45M is lower than New Jersey Resources's net income of $131.3M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while New Jersey Resources's PE ratio is 14.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.38x versus 2.62x for New Jersey Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 12.13% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 19.31%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 5.87% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $46.80, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.17%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Northwest Natural Holding, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Northwest Natural Holding.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.564, which suggesting that the stock is 43.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.149%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.74%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $370.9M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $27.3M. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $45M is higher than RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 18.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.38x versus 2.58x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spire has a net margin of 12.13% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 12.15%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 5.87% beat Spire's return on equity of 7.56%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $46.80, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Spire has an analysts' consensus of $77.40 which suggests that it could grow by 3.15%. Given that Northwest Natural Holding has higher upside potential than Spire, analysts believe Northwest Natural Holding is more attractive than Spire.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.564, which suggesting that the stock is 43.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spire has a beta of 0.564, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.626%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.74%. Spire offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Spire pays out 72.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $370.9M, which are smaller than Spire quarterly revenues of $669.1M. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $45M is lower than Spire's net income of $81.3M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while Spire's PE ratio is 18.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.38x versus 1.72x for Spire. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southwest Gas Holdings has a net margin of 12.13% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 7.28%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 5.87% beat Southwest Gas Holdings's return on equity of 5.59%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $46.80, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Southwest Gas Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $78.14 which suggests that it could grow by 9.92%. Given that Northwest Natural Holding has higher upside potential than Southwest Gas Holdings, analysts believe Northwest Natural Holding is more attractive than Southwest Gas Holdings.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.564, which suggesting that the stock is 43.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southwest Gas Holdings has a beta of 0.502, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.773%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.74%. Southwest Gas Holdings offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Southwest Gas Holdings pays out 89.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $370.9M, which are smaller than Southwest Gas Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $45M is lower than Southwest Gas Holdings's net income of $92.5M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while Southwest Gas Holdings's PE ratio is 25.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.38x versus 1.00x for Southwest Gas Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.