NOMD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Nomad Foods's net margin of --. Nomad Foods's return on equity of 8.59% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's return on equity of 16.39%.

Nomad Foods has a consensus price target of $24.90, signalling upside risk potential of 35.18%. On the other hand Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has an analysts' consensus of $91.78 which suggests that it could grow by 12.15%. Given that Nomad Foods has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC, analysts believe Nomad Foods is more attractive than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC.

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.322% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a beta of 0.742, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.755%.

Nomad Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Nomad Foods pays 39.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC pays out 64.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomad Foods quarterly revenues are $845.7M, which are larger than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC quarterly revenues of --. Nomad Foods's net income of $54.8M is higher than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's net income of --. Notably, Nomad Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.15x while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's PE ratio is 24.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomad Foods is 0.89x versus 1.72x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diageo PLC has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Nomad Foods's net margin of --. Nomad Foods's return on equity of 8.59% beat Diageo PLC's return on equity of 29.79%.

Nomad Foods has a consensus price target of $24.90, signalling upside risk potential of 35.18%. On the other hand Diageo PLC has an analysts' consensus of $126.29 which suggests that it could grow by 24.18%. Given that Nomad Foods has higher upside potential than Diageo PLC, analysts believe Nomad Foods is more attractive than Diageo PLC.

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.322% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo PLC has a beta of 0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.844%.

Nomad Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Diageo PLC offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Nomad Foods pays 39.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo PLC pays out 57.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomad Foods quarterly revenues are $845.7M, which are larger than Diageo PLC quarterly revenues of --. Nomad Foods's net income of $54.8M is higher than Diageo PLC's net income of --. Notably, Nomad Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.15x while Diageo PLC's PE ratio is 15.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomad Foods is 0.89x versus 2.81x for Diageo PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unilever PLC has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Nomad Foods's net margin of --. Nomad Foods's return on equity of 8.59% beat Unilever PLC's return on equity of 26%.

Nomad Foods has a consensus price target of $24.90, signalling upside risk potential of 35.18%. On the other hand Unilever PLC has an analysts' consensus of $66.74 which suggests that it could grow by 16.44%. Given that Nomad Foods has higher upside potential than Unilever PLC, analysts believe Nomad Foods is more attractive than Unilever PLC.

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.322% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.425, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.53%.

Nomad Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Unilever PLC offers a yield of 3.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Nomad Foods pays 39.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC pays out 75.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomad Foods quarterly revenues are $845.7M, which are larger than Unilever PLC quarterly revenues of --. Nomad Foods's net income of $54.8M is higher than Unilever PLC's net income of --. Notably, Nomad Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.15x while Unilever PLC's PE ratio is 23.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomad Foods is 0.89x versus 2.23x for Unilever PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waldencast PLC has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Nomad Foods's net margin of --. Nomad Foods's return on equity of 8.59% beat Waldencast PLC's return on equity of -5.64%.

Nomad Foods has a consensus price target of $24.90, signalling upside risk potential of 35.18%. On the other hand Waldencast PLC has an analysts' consensus of $4.85 which suggests that it could grow by 107.27%. Given that Waldencast PLC has higher upside potential than Nomad Foods, analysts believe Waldencast PLC is more attractive than Nomad Foods.

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.322% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waldencast PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nomad Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Waldencast PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nomad Foods pays 39.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Waldencast PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nomad Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nomad Foods quarterly revenues are $845.7M, which are larger than Waldencast PLC quarterly revenues of --. Nomad Foods's net income of $54.8M is higher than Waldencast PLC's net income of --. Notably, Nomad Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.15x while Waldencast PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomad Foods is 0.89x versus 0.93x for Waldencast PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.