NOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

California Resources has a net margin of 57.9% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of 34.85%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56% beat California Resources's return on equity of 22.28%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $49.38, signalling upside risk potential of 25.32%. On the other hand California Resources has an analysts' consensus of $68.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.2%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than Northern Oil & Gas, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than Northern Oil & Gas.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.848, which suggesting that the stock is 84.78% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. California Resources offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources pays out 14.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $515.5M, which are smaller than California Resources quarterly revenues of $990M. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M is lower than California Resources's net income of $345M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.73x while California Resources's PE ratio is 8.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.84x versus 1.51x for California Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Ridge Resources has a net margin of 57.9% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of 9.62%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56% beat Granite Ridge Resources's return on equity of 7.21%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $49.38, signalling upside risk potential of 25.32%. On the other hand Granite Ridge Resources has an analysts' consensus of $7.56 which suggests that it could grow by 11.01%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Granite Ridge Resources, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Granite Ridge Resources.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.848, which suggesting that the stock is 84.78% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Ridge Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. Granite Ridge Resources offers a yield of 6.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Ridge Resources pays out 72.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $515.5M, which are larger than Granite Ridge Resources quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M is higher than Granite Ridge Resources's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.73x while Granite Ridge Resources's PE ratio is 18.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.84x versus 2.34x for Granite Ridge Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 57.9% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of 15.8%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 13.88%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $49.38, signalling upside risk potential of 25.32%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $62.18 which suggests that it could grow by 21.47%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.848, which suggesting that the stock is 84.78% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.567, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.699%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $515.5M, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M is lower than Occidental Petroleum's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.73x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 13.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.84x versus 1.81x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W&T Offshore has a net margin of 57.9% compared to Northern Oil & Gas's net margin of -30.42%. Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56% beat W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $49.38, signalling upside risk potential of 25.32%. On the other hand W&T Offshore has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 484.8%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Northern Oil & Gas, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Northern Oil & Gas.

Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.848, which suggesting that the stock is 84.78% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W&T Offshore has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.265%.

Northern Oil & Gas has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. W&T Offshore offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Northern Oil & Gas pays 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues are $515.5M, which are larger than W&T Offshore quarterly revenues of $121.4M. Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M is higher than W&T Offshore's net income of -$36.9M. Notably, Northern Oil & Gas's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.73x while W&T Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Oil & Gas is 1.84x versus 0.47x for W&T Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.