MPX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 8.92% compared to Marine Products's net margin of --. Marine Products's return on equity of 12.94% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Marine Products has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.76%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Marine Products has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Marine Products is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Marine Products has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marine Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.05%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marine Products pays 244.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marine Products quarterly revenues are $47.8M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Marine Products's net income of $4.3M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Marine Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marine Products is 1.13x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a net margin of 8.92% compared to Marine Products's net margin of 1.54%. Marine Products's return on equity of 12.94% beat Goodyear Tire & Rubber's return on equity of 1.44%.

Marine Products has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.76%. On the other hand Goodyear Tire & Rubber has an analysts' consensus of $11.54 which suggests that it could grow by 18.97%. Given that Goodyear Tire & Rubber has higher upside potential than Marine Products, analysts believe Goodyear Tire & Rubber is more attractive than Marine Products.

Marine Products has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.854%.

Marine Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.05%. Goodyear Tire & Rubber offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marine Products pays 244.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodyear Tire & Rubber pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marine Products quarterly revenues are $47.8M, which are smaller than Goodyear Tire & Rubber quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Marine Products's net income of $4.3M is lower than Goodyear Tire & Rubber's net income of $76M. Notably, Marine Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while Goodyear Tire & Rubber's PE ratio is 40.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marine Products is 1.13x versus 0.15x for Goodyear Tire & Rubber. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MillerKnoll has a net margin of 8.92% compared to Marine Products's net margin of -1.45%. Marine Products's return on equity of 12.94% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity of 2.13%.

Marine Products has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.76%. On the other hand MillerKnoll has an analysts' consensus of $30.50 which suggests that it could grow by 75.49%. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Marine Products, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Marine Products.

Marine Products has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.388%.

Marine Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.05%. MillerKnoll offers a yield of 4.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Marine Products pays 244.96% of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll pays out 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marine Products's is not.

Marine Products quarterly revenues are $47.8M, which are smaller than MillerKnoll quarterly revenues of $876.2M. Marine Products's net income of $4.3M is higher than MillerKnoll's net income of -$12.7M. Notably, Marine Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while MillerKnoll's PE ratio is 41.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marine Products is 1.13x versus 0.34x for MillerKnoll. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of 8.92% compared to Marine Products's net margin of -46.97%. Marine Products's return on equity of 12.94% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Marine Products has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.76%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 542.2%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Marine Products, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Marine Products.

Marine Products has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.56%.

Marine Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.05%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marine Products pays 244.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marine Products quarterly revenues are $47.8M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Marine Products's net income of $4.3M is higher than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Marine Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marine Products is 1.13x versus 1.29x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.