LZB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 5.45% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of --. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.64%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that La-Z-Boy has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe La-Z-Boy is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

La-Z-Boy has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La-Z-Boy pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. La-Z-Boy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues are $521.8M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, La-Z-Boy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.21x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La-Z-Boy is 0.78x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Lovesac has a net margin of 5.45% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of 14.62%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24% beat The Lovesac's return on equity of 5.57%.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.64%. On the other hand The Lovesac has an analysts' consensus of $31.67 which suggests that it could grow by 64.93%. Given that The Lovesac has higher upside potential than La-Z-Boy, analysts believe The Lovesac is more attractive than La-Z-Boy.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Lovesac has a beta of 3.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 207.891%.

La-Z-Boy has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. The Lovesac offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La-Z-Boy pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. The Lovesac pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. La-Z-Boy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues are $521.8M, which are larger than The Lovesac quarterly revenues of $241.5M. La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M is lower than The Lovesac's net income of $35.3M. Notably, La-Z-Boy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.21x while The Lovesac's PE ratio is 32.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La-Z-Boy is 0.78x versus 0.47x for The Lovesac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonoco Products has a net margin of 5.45% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of -11.66%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24% beat Sonoco Products's return on equity of 6.79%.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.64%. On the other hand Sonoco Products has an analysts' consensus of $56.38 which suggests that it could grow by 27.75%. Given that Sonoco Products has higher upside potential than La-Z-Boy, analysts believe Sonoco Products is more attractive than La-Z-Boy.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonoco Products has a beta of 0.638, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.207%.

La-Z-Boy has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Sonoco Products offers a yield of 4.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. La-Z-Boy pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonoco Products pays out 124.12% of its earnings as a dividend. La-Z-Boy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sonoco Products's is not.

La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues are $521.8M, which are larger than Sonoco Products quarterly revenues of $368.5M. La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M is higher than Sonoco Products's net income of -$43M. Notably, La-Z-Boy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.21x while Sonoco Products's PE ratio is 26.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La-Z-Boy is 0.78x versus 0.83x for Sonoco Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of 5.45% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of -46.97%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.64%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 554.21%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than La-Z-Boy, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than La-Z-Boy.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.56%.

La-Z-Boy has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La-Z-Boy pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. La-Z-Boy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues are $521.8M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M is higher than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, La-Z-Boy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.21x while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La-Z-Boy is 0.78x versus 1.27x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.