LII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of 14.7% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 12.1%. Lennox International's return on equity of 142.28% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.32%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $613.89, signalling upside risk potential of 7.79%. On the other hand Ingersoll Rand has an analysts' consensus of $99.95 which suggests that it could grow by 23.45%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.133, which suggesting that the stock is 13.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.477, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.669%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Ingersoll Rand offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Lennox International pays 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Lennox International's net income of $197.7M is lower than Ingersoll Rand's net income of $229.8M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.27x while Ingersoll Rand's PE ratio is 39.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 3.82x versus 4.56x for Ingersoll Rand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Louisiana-Pacific has a net margin of 14.7% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 9.12%. Lennox International's return on equity of 142.28% beat Louisiana-Pacific's return on equity of 25.7%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $613.89, signalling upside risk potential of 7.79%. On the other hand Louisiana-Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $109.70 which suggests that it could grow by 18.31%. Given that Louisiana-Pacific has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Louisiana-Pacific is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.133, which suggesting that the stock is 13.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Louisiana-Pacific has a beta of 2.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.499%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Louisiana-Pacific offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Lennox International pays 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Louisiana-Pacific pays out 17.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Louisiana-Pacific quarterly revenues of $680M. Lennox International's net income of $197.7M is higher than Louisiana-Pacific's net income of $62M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.27x while Louisiana-Pacific's PE ratio is 15.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 3.82x versus 2.25x for Louisiana-Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trane Technologies PLC has a net margin of 14.7% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 12.4%. Lennox International's return on equity of 142.28% beat Trane Technologies PLC's return on equity of 35.67%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $613.89, signalling upside risk potential of 7.79%. On the other hand Trane Technologies PLC has an analysts' consensus of $402.37 which suggests that it could grow by 15.91%. Given that Trane Technologies PLC has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Trane Technologies PLC is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.133, which suggesting that the stock is 13.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trane Technologies PLC has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.428%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Trane Technologies PLC offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Lennox International pays 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Trane Technologies PLC pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Trane Technologies PLC quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Lennox International's net income of $197.7M is lower than Trane Technologies PLC's net income of $604.3M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.27x while Trane Technologies PLC's PE ratio is 30.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 3.82x versus 4.00x for Trane Technologies PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Advanced Drainage Systems has a net margin of 14.7% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 11.76%. Lennox International's return on equity of 142.28% beat Advanced Drainage Systems's return on equity of 33.69%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $613.89, signalling upside risk potential of 7.79%. On the other hand Advanced Drainage Systems has an analysts' consensus of $157.75 which suggests that it could grow by 45.77%. Given that Advanced Drainage Systems has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Advanced Drainage Systems is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.133, which suggesting that the stock is 13.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Drainage Systems has a beta of 1.608, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.807%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Advanced Drainage Systems offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Lennox International pays 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Drainage Systems pays out 8.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Advanced Drainage Systems quarterly revenues of $690.5M. Lennox International's net income of $197.7M is higher than Advanced Drainage Systems's net income of $81.2M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.27x while Advanced Drainage Systems's PE ratio is 18.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 3.82x versus 2.88x for Advanced Drainage Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.