LDOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cantaloupe has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 6.75%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 8.34%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $169.81, signalling upside risk potential of 16.54%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 58.63%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Leidos Holdings, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Leidos Holdings.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.507%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $73.7M. Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M is higher than Cantaloupe's net income of $5M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 39.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.19x versus 2.05x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 7.26%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23% beat International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $169.81, signalling upside risk potential of 16.54%. On the other hand International Business Machines has an analysts' consensus of $253.01 which suggests that it could grow by 8.87%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than International Business Machines.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.796%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. International Business Machines offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines pays out 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Business Machines's is not.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than International Business Machines quarterly revenues of $14.5B. Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M is lower than International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while International Business Machines's PE ratio is 40.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.19x versus 3.46x for International Business Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gartner has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 23.24%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23% beat Gartner's return on equity of 140.26%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $169.81, signalling upside risk potential of 16.54%. On the other hand Gartner has an analysts' consensus of $483.12 which suggests that it could grow by 16.11%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Gartner, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Gartner.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gartner has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.975%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Gartner offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Gartner pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Gartner quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M is lower than Gartner's net income of $398.6M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Gartner's PE ratio is 25.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.19x versus 5.20x for Gartner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Science Applications International has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 5.33%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23% beat Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $169.81, signalling upside risk potential of 16.54%. On the other hand Science Applications International has an analysts' consensus of $125.37 which suggests that it could grow by 3.36%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Science Applications International.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Science Applications International has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.891%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Science Applications International offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Science Applications International quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M is higher than Science Applications International's net income of $98M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Science Applications International's PE ratio is 16.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.19x versus 0.82x for Science Applications International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.