KVYO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Freshworks has a net margin of -0.57% compared to Klaviyo's net margin of -16.06%. Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.78% beat Freshworks's return on equity of -9.3%.

Klaviyo has a consensus price target of $43.40, signalling upside risk potential of 5.6%. On the other hand Freshworks has an analysts' consensus of $18.81 which suggests that it could grow by 16.49%. Given that Freshworks has higher upside potential than Klaviyo, analysts believe Freshworks is more attractive than Klaviyo.

Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshworks has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Klaviyo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freshworks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Klaviyo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshworks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Klaviyo quarterly revenues are $235.1M, which are larger than Freshworks quarterly revenues of $186.6M. Klaviyo's net income of -$1.3M is higher than Freshworks's net income of -$30M. Notably, Klaviyo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Freshworks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Klaviyo is 12.46x versus 7.04x for Freshworks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of -0.57% compared to Klaviyo's net margin of 19.78%. Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.78% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.27%.

Klaviyo has a consensus price target of $43.40, signalling upside risk potential of 5.6%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $45.22 which suggests that it could fall by -33.73%. Given that Klaviyo has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe Klaviyo is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Klaviyo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Klaviyo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Klaviyo quarterly revenues are $235.1M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $725.5M. Klaviyo's net income of -$1.3M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $143.5M. Notably, Klaviyo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 341.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Klaviyo is 12.46x versus 62.02x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toast has a net margin of -0.57% compared to Klaviyo's net margin of 4.29%. Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.78% beat Toast's return on equity of -3.92%.

Klaviyo has a consensus price target of $43.40, signalling upside risk potential of 5.6%. On the other hand Toast has an analysts' consensus of $39.47 which suggests that it could grow by 6.07%. Given that Toast has higher upside potential than Klaviyo, analysts believe Toast is more attractive than Klaviyo.

Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toast has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Klaviyo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Toast offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Klaviyo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Toast pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Klaviyo quarterly revenues are $235.1M, which are smaller than Toast quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Klaviyo's net income of -$1.3M is lower than Toast's net income of $56M. Notably, Klaviyo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Toast's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Klaviyo is 12.46x versus 4.53x for Toast. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yext has a net margin of -0.57% compared to Klaviyo's net margin of -11.23%. Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.78% beat Yext's return on equity of -12.46%.

Klaviyo has a consensus price target of $43.40, signalling upside risk potential of 5.6%. On the other hand Yext has an analysts' consensus of $8.75 which suggests that it could grow by 34%. Given that Yext has higher upside potential than Klaviyo, analysts believe Yext is more attractive than Klaviyo.

Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yext has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.636%.

Klaviyo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yext offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Klaviyo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yext pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Klaviyo quarterly revenues are $235.1M, which are larger than Yext quarterly revenues of $114M. Klaviyo's net income of -$1.3M is higher than Yext's net income of -$12.8M. Notably, Klaviyo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Yext's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Klaviyo is 12.46x versus 2.01x for Yext. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.