KGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of -95.17%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 14.51% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.63%.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $14.13, signalling downside risk potential of -3.58%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.11 which suggests that it could grow by 87.35%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Kinross Gold.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kinross Gold pays 15.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.4M. Kinross Gold's net income of $275.6M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.03x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 3.51x versus 26.25x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of -24.56%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 14.51% beat McEwen Mining's return on equity of -8.85%.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $14.13, signalling downside risk potential of -3.58%. On the other hand McEwen Mining has an analysts' consensus of $14.56 which suggests that it could grow by 77.59%. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than Kinross Gold.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.055%.

Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. McEwen Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold pays 15.55% of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than McEwen Mining quarterly revenues of $33.5M. Kinross Gold's net income of $275.6M is higher than McEwen Mining's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.03x while McEwen Mining's PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 3.51x versus 2.40x for McEwen Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmont has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 24.82%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 14.51% beat Newmont's return on equity of 11.32%.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $14.13, signalling downside risk potential of -3.58%. On the other hand Newmont has an analysts' consensus of $58.21 which suggests that it could grow by 6.64%. Given that Newmont has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Newmont is more attractive than Kinross Gold.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmont has a beta of 0.540, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.989%.

Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Newmont offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Kinross Gold pays 15.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmont pays out 34.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Newmont quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Kinross Gold's net income of $275.6M is lower than Newmont's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.03x while Newmont's PE ratio is 18.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 3.51x versus 3.35x for Newmont. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of --. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 14.51% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $14.13, signalling downside risk potential of -3.58%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $39.62 which suggests that it could grow by 217.97%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Kinross Gold.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.796% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.332%.

Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold pays 15.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Kinross Gold's net income of $275.6M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of -$20.2M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.03x while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 3.51x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.