HII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 7.97%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 17.24% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $228.01, signalling upside risk potential of 9.3%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $305.47 which suggests that it could grow by 12.46%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.560, which suggesting that the stock is 43.97% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.616%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 29.37% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $101M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $930M. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.78x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.70x versus 1.63x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 9.49%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 17.24% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $228.01, signalling upside risk potential of 9.3%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $559.61 which suggests that it could grow by 10.53%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.560, which suggesting that the stock is 43.97% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.791%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 29.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $17.1B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $101M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.78x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 18.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.70x versus 1.71x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of -8.57%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 17.24% beat Mercury Systems's return on equity of -7.95%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $228.01, signalling upside risk potential of 9.3%. On the other hand Mercury Systems has an analysts' consensus of $35.75 which suggests that it could fall by -17.97%. Given that Huntington Ingalls Industries has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Huntington Ingalls Industries is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.560, which suggesting that the stock is 43.97% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.780, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.001%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Mercury Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 29.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Mercury Systems quarterly revenues of $204.4M. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $101M is higher than Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.78x while Mercury Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.70x versus 2.94x for Mercury Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 7.33%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 17.24% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.41%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $228.01, signalling upside risk potential of 9.3%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $136.60 which suggests that it could grow by 8.63%. Given that Huntington Ingalls Industries has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Huntington Ingalls Industries is more attractive than RTX.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.560, which suggesting that the stock is 43.97% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.837, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.306%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. RTX offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 29.37% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but RTX's is not.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.1B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $101M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.78x while RTX's PE ratio is 35.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.70x versus 2.14x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.