GOLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 27.33% compared to Barrick Gold's net margin of -95.17%. Barrick Gold's return on equity of 6.58% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.63%.

Barrick Gold has a consensus price target of $23.42, signalling upside risk potential of 14.73%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.11 which suggests that it could grow by 96.84%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Barrick Gold, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Barrick Gold.

Barrick Gold has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.341% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Barrick Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Barrick Gold pays 32.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Barrick Gold quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.4M. Barrick Gold's net income of $996M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Barrick Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Barrick Gold is 2.77x versus 24.98x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 27.33% compared to Barrick Gold's net margin of -24.56%. Barrick Gold's return on equity of 6.58% beat McEwen Mining's return on equity of -8.85%.

Barrick Gold has a consensus price target of $23.42, signalling upside risk potential of 14.73%. On the other hand McEwen Mining has an analysts' consensus of $14.56 which suggests that it could grow by 78.46%. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than Barrick Gold, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than Barrick Gold.

Barrick Gold has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.341% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.055%.

Barrick Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. McEwen Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Barrick Gold pays 32.46% of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Barrick Gold quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than McEwen Mining quarterly revenues of $33.5M. Barrick Gold's net income of $996M is higher than McEwen Mining's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Barrick Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while McEwen Mining's PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Barrick Gold is 2.77x versus 2.39x for McEwen Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmont has a net margin of 27.33% compared to Barrick Gold's net margin of 24.82%. Barrick Gold's return on equity of 6.58% beat Newmont's return on equity of 11.32%.

Barrick Gold has a consensus price target of $23.42, signalling upside risk potential of 14.73%. On the other hand Newmont has an analysts' consensus of $57.10 which suggests that it could grow by 4.22%. Given that Barrick Gold has higher upside potential than Newmont, analysts believe Barrick Gold is more attractive than Newmont.

Barrick Gold has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.341% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmont has a beta of 0.540, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.989%.

Barrick Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Newmont offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Barrick Gold pays 32.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmont pays out 34.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Barrick Gold quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Newmont quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Barrick Gold's net income of $996M is lower than Newmont's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Barrick Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while Newmont's PE ratio is 18.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Barrick Gold is 2.77x versus 3.37x for Newmont. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of 27.33% compared to Barrick Gold's net margin of --. Barrick Gold's return on equity of 6.58% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Barrick Gold has a consensus price target of $23.42, signalling upside risk potential of 14.73%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $39.62 which suggests that it could grow by 209.62%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Barrick Gold, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Barrick Gold.

Barrick Gold has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.341% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.332%.

Barrick Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Barrick Gold pays 32.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Barrick Gold quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Barrick Gold's net income of $996M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of -$20.2M. Notably, Barrick Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Barrick Gold is 2.77x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.