GMRE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Getty Realty has a net margin of 8.1% compared to Global Medical REIT's net margin of 42.05%. Global Medical REIT's return on equity of 1.14% beat Getty Realty's return on equity of 7.43%.

Global Medical REIT has a consensus price target of $10.47, signalling upside risk potential of 46.01%. On the other hand Getty Realty has an analysts' consensus of $33.43 which suggests that it could grow by 21.43%. Given that Global Medical REIT has higher upside potential than Getty Realty, analysts believe Global Medical REIT is more attractive than Getty Realty.

Global Medical REIT has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Getty Realty has a beta of 0.848, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.153%.

Global Medical REIT has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.72%. Getty Realty offers a yield of 6.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Global Medical REIT pays 990.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Getty Realty pays out 141.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Medical REIT quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than Getty Realty quarterly revenues of $53M. Global Medical REIT's net income of $2.8M is lower than Getty Realty's net income of $22.3M. Notably, Global Medical REIT's price-to-earnings ratio is 717.00x while Getty Realty's PE ratio is 21.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Medical REIT is 3.42x versus 7.38x for Getty Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a net margin of 8.1% compared to Global Medical REIT's net margin of 8.8%. Global Medical REIT's return on equity of 1.14% beat National Storage Affiliates Trust's return on equity of 5.9%.

Global Medical REIT has a consensus price target of $10.47, signalling upside risk potential of 46.01%. On the other hand National Storage Affiliates Trust has an analysts' consensus of $39.88 which suggests that it could grow by 22.72%. Given that Global Medical REIT has higher upside potential than National Storage Affiliates Trust, analysts believe Global Medical REIT is more attractive than National Storage Affiliates Trust.

Global Medical REIT has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.558%.

Global Medical REIT has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.72%. National Storage Affiliates Trust offers a yield of 6.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Global Medical REIT pays 990.35% of its earnings as a dividend. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays out 172.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Medical REIT quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than National Storage Affiliates Trust quarterly revenues of $190.1M. Global Medical REIT's net income of $2.8M is lower than National Storage Affiliates Trust's net income of $16.7M. Notably, Global Medical REIT's price-to-earnings ratio is 717.00x while National Storage Affiliates Trust's PE ratio is 28.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Medical REIT is 3.42x versus 3.85x for National Storage Affiliates Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 8.1% compared to Global Medical REIT's net margin of 4.81%. Global Medical REIT's return on equity of 1.14% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

Global Medical REIT has a consensus price target of $10.47, signalling upside risk potential of 46.01%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.86 which suggests that it could grow by 37.75%. Given that Global Medical REIT has higher upside potential than Strawberry Fields REIT, analysts believe Global Medical REIT is more attractive than Strawberry Fields REIT.

Global Medical REIT has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Medical REIT has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.72%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 5.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Global Medical REIT pays 990.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Medical REIT's is not.

Global Medical REIT quarterly revenues are $35M, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. Global Medical REIT's net income of $2.8M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Global Medical REIT's price-to-earnings ratio is 717.00x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 17.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Medical REIT is 3.42x versus 0.61x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veris Residential has a net margin of 8.1% compared to Global Medical REIT's net margin of -18.28%. Global Medical REIT's return on equity of 1.14% beat Veris Residential's return on equity of -1.82%.

Global Medical REIT has a consensus price target of $10.47, signalling upside risk potential of 46.01%. On the other hand Veris Residential has an analysts' consensus of $19.79 which suggests that it could grow by 34.36%. Given that Global Medical REIT has higher upside potential than Veris Residential, analysts believe Global Medical REIT is more attractive than Veris Residential.

Global Medical REIT has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veris Residential has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.04%.

Global Medical REIT has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.72%. Veris Residential offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Global Medical REIT pays 990.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Veris Residential pays out -104.03% of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Medical REIT quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than Veris Residential quarterly revenues of $68.1M. Global Medical REIT's net income of $2.8M is higher than Veris Residential's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, Global Medical REIT's price-to-earnings ratio is 717.00x while Veris Residential's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Medical REIT is 3.42x versus 5.52x for Veris Residential. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.