FICO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intuit has a net margin of 34.67% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 11.89%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Intuit's return on equity of 16.84%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,045.01, signalling upside risk potential of 5.81%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $700.34 which suggests that it could grow by 17.99%. Given that Intuit has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Intuit is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.95% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.578%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $440M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $4B. Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M is lower than Intuit's net income of $471M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 88.70x while Intuit's PE ratio is 55.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 27.19x versus 9.80x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 34.67% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 0.54%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,045.01, signalling upside risk potential of 5.81%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 277.36%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.95% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.768%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $440M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M is higher than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 88.70x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 27.19x versus 0.62x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ncino has a net margin of 34.67% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of -13.16%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Ncino's return on equity of -3.51%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,045.01, signalling upside risk potential of 5.81%. On the other hand Ncino has an analysts' consensus of $26.14 which suggests that it could grow by 10.49%. Given that Ncino has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Ncino is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.95% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ncino has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ncino offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ncino pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $440M, which are larger than Ncino quarterly revenues of $141.4M. Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M is higher than Ncino's net income of -$18.6M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 88.70x while Ncino's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 27.19x versus 5.04x for Ncino. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cloudflare has a net margin of 34.67% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of -2.79%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -8.83%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,045.01, signalling upside risk potential of 5.81%. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $140.22 which suggests that it could grow by 30.9%. Given that Cloudflare has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Cloudflare is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.95% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.303%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $440M, which are smaller than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $459.9M. Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M is higher than Cloudflare's net income of -$12.8M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 88.70x while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 27.19x versus 21.90x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.