Is Uber Finally on the Path to Consistent Profitability?
After posting massive losses quarter after quarter for years, Uber…
Sell
43
ESE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$150.07
Seasonality move
:
4.32%
Day range:
$148.41 - $151.91
52-week range:
$97.11 - $171.28
Dividend yield:
0.21%
P/E ratio:
35.41x
P/S ratio:
3.70x
P/B ratio:
3.15x
Volume:
110K
Avg. volume:
183K
1-year change:
52.54%
Market cap:
$3.9B
Revenue:
$1B
EPS (TTM):
$4.26
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESE
ESCO Technologies
|
$265M | $1.25 | 6.36% | 39.17% | $170.50 |
|
CPSH
CPS Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FARO
Faro Technologies
|
$80.2M | $0.16 | -4.74% | 400% | $38.50 |
|
KNW
Know Labs
|
-- | -$0.05 | -- | -- | -- |
|
LGL
LGL Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TRMB
Trimble
|
$810.5M | $0.58 | -5.12% | -88.55% | $87.05 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESE
ESCO Technologies
|
$150.83 | $170.50 | $3.9B | 35.41x | $0.08 | 0.21% | 3.70x |
|
CPSH
CPS Technologies
|
$1.46 | -- | $21.2M | 35.93x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.00x |
|
FARO
Faro Technologies
|
$24.76 | $38.50 | $470M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.38x |
|
KNW
Know Labs
|
$0.08 | -- | $8.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LGL
LGL Group
|
$6.60 | -- | $35.5M | 89.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 16.46x |
|
TRMB
Trimble
|
$59.59 | $87.05 | $14.6B | 9.78x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.00x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESE
ESCO Technologies
|
8.3% | 1.154 | 3.26% | 1.28x |
|
CPSH
CPS Technologies
|
0.06% | -0.356 | 0.03% | 2.17x |
|
FARO
Faro Technologies
|
21.97% | 3.264 | 14.62% | 1.75x |
|
KNW
Know Labs
|
-- | 2.553 | -- | -- |
|
LGL
LGL Group
|
-- | 0.315 | -- | 56.50x |
|
TRMB
Trimble
|
19.49% | 1.535 | 8.01% | 0.82x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESE
ESCO Technologies
|
$98.4M | $31.6M | 8.15% | 9.2% | 13.03% | $26.4M |
|
CPSH
CPS Technologies
|
-$271.5K | -$1.3M | -19.3% | -19.34% | -22.23% | -$1.5M |
|
FARO
Faro Technologies
|
$53.1M | $7.3M | -2.75% | -3.51% | 4.46% | $12.5M |
|
KNW
Know Labs
|
-- | -$3.2M | -- | -- | -- | -$3.3M |
|
LGL
LGL Group
|
$282K | -$391K | 0.89% | 0.89% | -60.15% | $528K |
|
TRMB
Trimble
|
$681.2M | $175.3M | 20.24% | 28.82% | 11.3% | $109M |
ESCO Technologies vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ESE or CPSH?
CPS Technologies has a net margin of 9.5% compared to ESCO Technologies's net margin of -16.77%. ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 9.2% beat CPS Technologies's return on equity of -19.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESEESCO Technologies39.83% $0.91 $1.3B CPSHCPS Technologies-4.58% -$0.07 $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ESE or CPSH?
ESCO Technologies has a consensus price target of $170.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.04%. On the other hand CPS Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ESCO Technologies has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe ESCO Technologies is more attractive than CPS Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESEESCO Technologies2 1 0 CPSHCPS Technologies0 0 0 -
Is ESE or CPSH More Risky?
ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.137, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.661%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESE or CPSH?
ESCO Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. CPS Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESCO Technologies pays 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. CPS Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESE or CPSH?
ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues are $247M, which are larger than CPS Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.9M. ESCO Technologies's net income of $23.5M is higher than CPS Technologies's net income of -$995.2K. Notably, ESCO Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.41x while CPS Technologies's PE ratio is 35.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESCO Technologies is 3.70x versus 1.00x for CPS Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESEESCO Technologies3.70x 35.41x $247M $23.5M CPSHCPS Technologies1.00x 35.93x $5.9M -$995.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns ESE or FARO?
Faro Technologies has a net margin of 9.5% compared to ESCO Technologies's net margin of -1.05%. ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 9.2% beat Faro Technologies's return on equity of -3.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESEESCO Technologies39.83% $0.91 $1.3B FAROFaro Technologies56.75% -$0.05 $319.9M -
What do Analysts Say About ESE or FARO?
ESCO Technologies has a consensus price target of $170.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.04%. On the other hand Faro Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $38.50 which suggests that it could grow by 55.49%. Given that Faro Technologies has higher upside potential than ESCO Technologies, analysts believe Faro Technologies is more attractive than ESCO Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESEESCO Technologies2 1 0 FAROFaro Technologies1 0 0 -
Is ESE or FARO More Risky?
ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.555, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.481%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESE or FARO?
ESCO Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Faro Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESCO Technologies pays 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Faro Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESE or FARO?
ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues are $247M, which are larger than Faro Technologies quarterly revenues of $93.5M. ESCO Technologies's net income of $23.5M is higher than Faro Technologies's net income of -$986K. Notably, ESCO Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.41x while Faro Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESCO Technologies is 3.70x versus 1.38x for Faro Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESEESCO Technologies3.70x 35.41x $247M $23.5M FAROFaro Technologies1.38x -- $93.5M -$986K
-
Which has Higher Returns ESE or KNW?
Know Labs has a net margin of 9.5% compared to ESCO Technologies's net margin of --. ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 9.2% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESEESCO Technologies39.83% $0.91 $1.3B KNWKnow Labs-- -$0.04 -- -
What do Analysts Say About ESE or KNW?
ESCO Technologies has a consensus price target of $170.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.04%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1167.43%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than ESCO Technologies, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than ESCO Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESEESCO Technologies2 1 0 KNWKnow Labs0 0 0 -
Is ESE or KNW More Risky?
ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESE or KNW?
ESCO Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESCO Technologies pays 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESE or KNW?
ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues are $247M, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. ESCO Technologies's net income of $23.5M is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, ESCO Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.41x while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESCO Technologies is 3.70x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESEESCO Technologies3.70x 35.41x $247M $23.5M KNWKnow Labs-- -- -- -$3.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns ESE or LGL?
LGL Group has a net margin of 9.5% compared to ESCO Technologies's net margin of 11.08%. ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 9.2% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESEESCO Technologies39.83% $0.91 $1.3B LGLLGL Group43.39% $0.01 $41M -
What do Analysts Say About ESE or LGL?
ESCO Technologies has a consensus price target of $170.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.04%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.21%. Given that LGL Group has higher upside potential than ESCO Technologies, analysts believe LGL Group is more attractive than ESCO Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESEESCO Technologies2 1 0 LGLLGL Group0 0 0 -
Is ESE or LGL More Risky?
ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.283, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.692%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESE or LGL?
ESCO Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESCO Technologies pays 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESE or LGL?
ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues are $247M, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. ESCO Technologies's net income of $23.5M is higher than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, ESCO Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.41x while LGL Group's PE ratio is 89.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESCO Technologies is 3.70x versus 16.46x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESEESCO Technologies3.70x 35.41x $247M $23.5M LGLLGL Group16.46x 89.50x $650K $72K
-
Which has Higher Returns ESE or TRMB?
Trimble has a net margin of 9.5% compared to ESCO Technologies's net margin of 9.17%. ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 9.2% beat Trimble's return on equity of 28.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ESEESCO Technologies39.83% $0.91 $1.3B TRMBTrimble69.27% $0.36 $7.1B -
What do Analysts Say About ESE or TRMB?
ESCO Technologies has a consensus price target of $170.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.04%. On the other hand Trimble has an analysts' consensus of $87.05 which suggests that it could grow by 46.08%. Given that Trimble has higher upside potential than ESCO Technologies, analysts believe Trimble is more attractive than ESCO Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ESEESCO Technologies2 1 0 TRMBTrimble6 1 0 -
Is ESE or TRMB More Risky?
ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trimble has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.272%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ESE or TRMB?
ESCO Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Trimble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESCO Technologies pays 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Trimble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ESE or TRMB?
ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues are $247M, which are smaller than Trimble quarterly revenues of $983.4M. ESCO Technologies's net income of $23.5M is lower than Trimble's net income of $90.2M. Notably, ESCO Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.41x while Trimble's PE ratio is 9.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESCO Technologies is 3.70x versus 4.00x for Trimble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ESEESCO Technologies3.70x 35.41x $247M $23.5M TRMBTrimble4.00x 9.78x $983.4M $90.2M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
How High Will MSTY Go By 2030?
YieldMax’s MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) is a high-yield…
Will NVIDIA Stock Bounce Back?
After the wild market moves during February and March, investors…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
42
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
25
BULZ alert for Apr 17
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innov 3X Levd ETN [BULZ] is down 10.95% over the past day.
Sell
50
IBKR alert for Apr 17
Interactive Brokers Group [IBKR] is down 8.97% over the past day.
Sell
39
FNGA alert for Apr 17
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN [FNGA] is down 9.37% over the past day.
