CW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conrad Industries has a net margin of 14.3% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of --. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 16.73% beat Conrad Industries's return on equity of --.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $393.82, signalling upside risk potential of 21.47%. On the other hand Conrad Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -11.11%. Given that Curtiss-Wright has higher upside potential than Conrad Industries, analysts believe Curtiss-Wright is more attractive than Conrad Industries.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conrad Industries has a beta of 0.545, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.543%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Conrad Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Conrad Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $824.3M, which are larger than Conrad Industries quarterly revenues of --. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $117.9M is higher than Conrad Industries's net income of --. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.73x while Conrad Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 3.99x versus 0.29x for Conrad Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of 14.3% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 7.19%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 16.73% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.44%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $393.82, signalling upside risk potential of 21.47%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.46%. Given that Curtiss-Wright has higher upside potential than Sturm Ruger &, analysts believe Curtiss-Wright is more attractive than Sturm Ruger &.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.145, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.537%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 38.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $824.3M, which are larger than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $145.8M. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $117.9M is higher than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $10.5M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.73x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 22.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 3.99x versus 1.30x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VSE has a net margin of 14.3% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 4.37%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 16.73% beat VSE's return on equity of 2.02%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $393.82, signalling upside risk potential of 21.47%. On the other hand VSE has an analysts' consensus of $139.12 which suggests that it could grow by 20.06%. Given that Curtiss-Wright has higher upside potential than VSE, analysts believe Curtiss-Wright is more attractive than VSE.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VSE has a beta of 1.622, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.218%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. VSE offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. VSE pays out 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $824.3M, which are larger than VSE quarterly revenues of $299M. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $117.9M is higher than VSE's net income of $13.1M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.73x while VSE's PE ratio is 144.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 3.99x versus 1.93x for VSE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

V2X has a net margin of 14.3% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 2.16%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 16.73% beat V2X's return on equity of 3.47%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $393.82, signalling upside risk potential of 21.47%. On the other hand V2X has an analysts' consensus of $66.20 which suggests that it could grow by 34.69%. Given that V2X has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe V2X is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.553% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison V2X has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.671%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. V2X offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. V2X pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $824.3M, which are smaller than V2X quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $117.9M is higher than V2X's net income of $25M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.73x while V2X's PE ratio is 45.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 3.99x versus 0.36x for V2X. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.