CTVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Celanese has a net margin of -1.03% compared to Corteva's net margin of -80.76%. Corteva's return on equity of 3.64% beat Celanese's return on equity of -21.13%.

Corteva has a consensus price target of $69.17, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Celanese has an analysts' consensus of $60.58 which suggests that it could grow by 54.58%. Given that Celanese has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe Celanese is more attractive than Corteva.

Corteva has a beta of 0.728, which suggesting that the stock is 27.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Celanese has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.75%.

Corteva has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Celanese offers a yield of 5.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Corteva pays 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Celanese pays out -20.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Corteva's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corteva quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Celanese quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Corteva's net income of -$41M is higher than Celanese's net income of -$1.9B. Notably, Corteva's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.74x while Celanese's PE ratio is 7.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corteva is 2.48x versus 0.42x for Celanese. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dow has a net margin of -1.03% compared to Corteva's net margin of -0.51%. Corteva's return on equity of 3.64% beat Dow's return on equity of 5.97%.

Corteva has a consensus price target of $69.17, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Dow has an analysts' consensus of $40.95 which suggests that it could grow by 41.8%. Given that Dow has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe Dow is more attractive than Corteva.

Corteva has a beta of 0.728, which suggesting that the stock is 27.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dow has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.393%.

Corteva has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Dow offers a yield of 9.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Corteva pays 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Dow pays out 176.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Corteva's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dow's is not.

Corteva quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Dow quarterly revenues of $10.4B. Corteva's net income of -$41M is higher than Dow's net income of -$53M. Notably, Corteva's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.74x while Dow's PE ratio is 18.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corteva is 2.48x versus 0.47x for Dow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of -1.03% compared to Corteva's net margin of 4.06%. Corteva's return on equity of 3.64% beat Nucor's return on equity of 9.33%.

Corteva has a consensus price target of $69.17, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $148.82 which suggests that it could grow by 34.29%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Corteva.

Corteva has a beta of 0.728, which suggesting that the stock is 27.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.666, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.625%.

Corteva has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Corteva pays 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corteva quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Corteva's net income of -$41M is lower than Nucor's net income of $287M. Notably, Corteva's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.74x while Nucor's PE ratio is 13.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corteva is 2.48x versus 0.86x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -1.03% compared to Corteva's net margin of 5.35%. Corteva's return on equity of 3.64% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Corteva has a consensus price target of $69.17, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $145.24 which suggests that it could grow by 22.31%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Corteva.

Corteva has a beta of 0.728, which suggesting that the stock is 27.2% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.654%.

Corteva has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Corteva pays 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corteva quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Corteva's net income of -$41M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Corteva's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.74x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corteva is 2.48x versus 1.06x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.