BV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cass Information Systems has a net margin of -1.74% compared to BrightView Holdings's net margin of 11.19%. BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 4.12% beat Cass Information Systems's return on equity of 8.29%.

BrightView Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.68, signalling upside risk potential of 40.96%. On the other hand Cass Information Systems has an analysts' consensus of $47.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.9%. Given that BrightView Holdings has higher upside potential than Cass Information Systems, analysts believe BrightView Holdings is more attractive than Cass Information Systems.

BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.317, which suggesting that the stock is 31.666% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cass Information Systems has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.987%.

BrightView Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cass Information Systems offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. BrightView Holdings pays 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Cass Information Systems pays out 85.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues are $599.2M, which are larger than Cass Information Systems quarterly revenues of $41.1M. BrightView Holdings's net income of -$10.4M is lower than Cass Information Systems's net income of $4.6M. Notably, BrightView Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.61x while Cass Information Systems's PE ratio is 31.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightView Holdings is 0.46x versus 3.13x for Cass Information Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cintas has a net margin of -1.74% compared to BrightView Holdings's net margin of 17.51%. BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 4.12% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.05%.

BrightView Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.68, signalling upside risk potential of 40.96%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $195.74 which suggests that it could grow by 1.51%. Given that BrightView Holdings has higher upside potential than Cintas, analysts believe BrightView Holdings is more attractive than Cintas.

BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.317, which suggesting that the stock is 31.666% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.413, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.25%.

BrightView Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. BrightView Holdings pays 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues are $599.2M, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. BrightView Holdings's net income of -$10.4M is lower than Cintas's net income of $448.5M. Notably, BrightView Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.61x while Cintas's PE ratio is 46.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightView Holdings is 0.46x versus 7.99x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of -1.74% compared to BrightView Holdings's net margin of -47.19%. BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 4.12% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of -15.5%.

BrightView Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.68, signalling upside risk potential of 40.96%. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of $11.17 which suggests that it could grow by 62.07%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than BrightView Holdings, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than BrightView Holdings.

BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.317, which suggesting that the stock is 31.666% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.871%.

BrightView Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 8.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. BrightView Holdings pays 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues are $599.2M, which are larger than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $145.6M. BrightView Holdings's net income of -$10.4M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of -$68.7M. Notably, BrightView Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.61x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightView Holdings is 0.46x versus 0.40x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPAR Group has a net margin of -1.74% compared to BrightView Holdings's net margin of -0.38%. BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 4.12% beat SPAR Group's return on equity of 33.96%.

BrightView Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.68, signalling upside risk potential of 40.96%. On the other hand SPAR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 429.3%. Given that SPAR Group has higher upside potential than BrightView Holdings, analysts believe SPAR Group is more attractive than BrightView Holdings.

BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.317, which suggesting that the stock is 31.666% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPAR Group has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.439%.

BrightView Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPAR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BrightView Holdings pays 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. SPAR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BrightView Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues are $599.2M, which are larger than SPAR Group quarterly revenues of $37.8M. BrightView Holdings's net income of -$10.4M is lower than SPAR Group's net income of -$144K. Notably, BrightView Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.61x while SPAR Group's PE ratio is 2.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightView Holdings is 0.46x versus 0.14x for SPAR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.