ALB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of -78.91% compared to Albemarle's net margin of -5.3%. Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $117.05, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $13.45 which suggests that it could grow by 29.09%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Albemarle, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Albemarle.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.971, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.089%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Albemarle pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Albemarle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.71x versus 0.25x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of -78.91% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 1.61%. Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $117.05, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.92%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.878%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Albemarle pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Albemarle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 25.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.71x versus 0.41x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Mosaic has a net margin of -78.91% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 4.35%. Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47% beat The Mosaic's return on equity of 3.06%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $117.05, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand The Mosaic has an analysts' consensus of $32.30 which suggests that it could grow by 20.87%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than The Mosaic, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than The Mosaic.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.838%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. The Mosaic offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Albemarle pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic pays out 30.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than The Mosaic quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B is lower than The Mosaic's net income of $122.2M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while The Mosaic's PE ratio is 23.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.71x versus 0.75x for The Mosaic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of -78.91% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 3.36%. Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $117.05, signalling upside risk potential of 24.1%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $157.05 which suggests that it could grow by 27.31%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Albemarle, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Albemarle.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.604, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.425%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Albemarle pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Nucor's PE ratio is 11.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.71x versus 0.95x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.