AGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 23.31% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of -95.17%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 8.87% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.63%.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $31.13, signalling upside risk potential of 5.05%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.11 which suggests that it could grow by 87.35%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Alamos Gold, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Alamos Gold.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.221% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Alamos Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Alamos Gold pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold quarterly revenues are $375.8M, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.4M. Alamos Gold's net income of $87.6M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Alamos Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.94x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold is 8.98x versus 26.25x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 23.31% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of -24.56%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 8.87% beat McEwen Mining's return on equity of -8.85%.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $31.13, signalling upside risk potential of 5.05%. On the other hand McEwen Mining has an analysts' consensus of $14.56 which suggests that it could grow by 77.59%. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than Alamos Gold, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than Alamos Gold.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.221% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.055%.

Alamos Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. McEwen Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold quarterly revenues are $375.8M, which are larger than McEwen Mining quarterly revenues of $33.5M. Alamos Gold's net income of $87.6M is higher than McEwen Mining's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Alamos Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.94x while McEwen Mining's PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold is 8.98x versus 2.40x for McEwen Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rise Gold has a net margin of 23.31% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of --. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 8.87% beat Rise Gold's return on equity of --.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $31.13, signalling upside risk potential of 5.05%. On the other hand Rise Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alamos Gold has higher upside potential than Rise Gold, analysts believe Alamos Gold is more attractive than Rise Gold.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.221% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rise Gold has a beta of -1.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 240.197%.

Alamos Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Rise Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Rise Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold quarterly revenues are $375.8M, which are larger than Rise Gold quarterly revenues of --. Alamos Gold's net income of $87.6M is higher than Rise Gold's net income of -$686.3K. Notably, Alamos Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.94x while Rise Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold is 8.98x versus -- for Rise Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of 23.31% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of --. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 8.87% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $31.13, signalling upside risk potential of 5.05%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $39.62 which suggests that it could grow by 217.97%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Alamos Gold, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Alamos Gold.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.221% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.332%.

Alamos Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alamos Gold pays 12.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alamos Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alamos Gold quarterly revenues are $375.8M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Alamos Gold's net income of $87.6M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of -$20.2M. Notably, Alamos Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.94x while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alamos Gold is 8.98x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.