PRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Park National's net margin of 4.33%. Park National's return on equity of 11.8% beat Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -7.9%.

Park National has a consensus price target of $181.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Blue Ridge Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

Park National has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.772, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.78%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Blue Ridge Bankshares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park National pays 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays out -8.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $137.6M, which are larger than Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues of $21.8M. Park National's net income of $38.2M is higher than Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of $946K. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.20x while Blue Ridge Bankshares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 5.58x versus 1.28x for Blue Ridge Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Park National's net margin of 16.32%. Park National's return on equity of 11.8% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Park National has a consensus price target of $181.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 19.65%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Park National.

Park National has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Park National pays 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $137.6M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Park National's net income of $38.2M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.20x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 5.58x versus 2.76x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Park National's net margin of 32.77%. Park National's return on equity of 11.8% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 14.69%.

Park National has a consensus price target of $181.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.13%. Given that OptimumBank Holdings has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe OptimumBank Holdings is more attractive than Park National.

Park National has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park National pays 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $137.6M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.1M. Park National's net income of $38.2M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.20x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 5.58x versus 1.09x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Park National's net margin of 24.66%. Park National's return on equity of 11.8% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Park National has a consensus price target of $181.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.55%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Park National.

Park National has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.053% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.471%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Park National pays 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tompkins Financial's is not.

Park National quarterly revenues are $137.6M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Park National's net income of $38.2M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.20x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 5.58x versus 3.26x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.