FSP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Medical Properties Trust has a net margin of -30.05% compared to Franklin Street Properties's net margin of -178.07%. Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -7.71% beat Medical Properties Trust's return on equity of -39.12%.

Franklin Street Properties has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.29%. On the other hand Medical Properties Trust has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could fall by -6.94%. Given that Franklin Street Properties has higher upside potential than Medical Properties Trust, analysts believe Franklin Street Properties is more attractive than Medical Properties Trust.

Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Medical Properties Trust has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.214%.

Franklin Street Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Medical Properties Trust offers a yield of 9.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Franklin Street Properties pays -7.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Medical Properties Trust pays out -13.32% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues are $28.4M, which are smaller than Medical Properties Trust quarterly revenues of $231.8M. Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$8.5M is higher than Medical Properties Trust's net income of -$412.8M. Notably, Franklin Street Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Medical Properties Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Street Properties is 1.58x versus 3.56x for Medical Properties Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis has a net margin of -30.05% compared to Franklin Street Properties's net margin of 58.11%. Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -7.71% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.44%.

Franklin Street Properties has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.29%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $129.70 which suggests that it could grow by 16.38%. Given that Prologis has higher upside potential than Franklin Street Properties, analysts believe Prologis is more attractive than Franklin Street Properties.

Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.608%.

Franklin Street Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Franklin Street Properties pays -7.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues are $28.4M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$8.5M is lower than Prologis's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Franklin Street Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Prologis's PE ratio is 27.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Street Properties is 1.58x versus 12.96x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regency Centers has a net margin of -30.05% compared to Franklin Street Properties's net margin of 23.21%. Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -7.71% beat Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.69%.

Franklin Street Properties has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.29%. On the other hand Regency Centers has an analysts' consensus of $79.84 which suggests that it could grow by 8.53%. Given that Franklin Street Properties has higher upside potential than Regency Centers, analysts believe Franklin Street Properties is more attractive than Regency Centers.

Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regency Centers has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.334%.

Franklin Street Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Regency Centers offers a yield of 3.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Franklin Street Properties pays -7.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Regency Centers pays out 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues are $28.4M, which are smaller than Regency Centers quarterly revenues of $372.5M. Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$8.5M is lower than Regency Centers's net income of $86.5M. Notably, Franklin Street Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Regency Centers's PE ratio is 34.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Street Properties is 1.58x versus 9.26x for Regency Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Welltower has a net margin of -30.05% compared to Franklin Street Properties's net margin of 5.41%. Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -7.71% beat Welltower's return on equity of 3.21%.

Franklin Street Properties has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.29%. On the other hand Welltower has an analysts' consensus of $165.16 which suggests that it could grow by 7.14%. Given that Franklin Street Properties has higher upside potential than Welltower, analysts believe Franklin Street Properties is more attractive than Welltower.

Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Welltower has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.829%.

Franklin Street Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Welltower offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Franklin Street Properties pays -7.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Welltower pays out 162.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues are $28.4M, which are smaller than Welltower quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$8.5M is lower than Welltower's net income of $120M. Notably, Franklin Street Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Welltower's PE ratio is 98.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Street Properties is 1.58x versus 11.95x for Welltower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.