USAP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 12.67% compared to Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's net margin of 5.75%. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's return on equity of 11.36% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 13.56%.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.36%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $64.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.31%. Given that Commercial Metals has higher upside potential than Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, analysts believe Commercial Metals is more attractive than Universal Stainless & Alloy Products.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.829% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.383%.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products quarterly revenues are $87.3M, which are smaller than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's net income of $11.1M is lower than Commercial Metals's net income of $119.4M. Notably, Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 12.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Stainless & Alloy Products is 1.30x versus 0.74x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 12.67% compared to Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's net margin of -0.63%. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's return on equity of 11.36% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.36%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Universal Stainless & Alloy Products is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.829% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.002%.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products quarterly revenues are $87.3M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's net income of $11.1M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 14.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Stainless & Alloy Products is 1.30x versus 0.25x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radius Recycling has a net margin of 12.67% compared to Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's net margin of -29.44%. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's return on equity of 11.36% beat Radius Recycling's return on equity of -32.65%.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.36%. On the other hand Radius Recycling has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 41.75%. Given that Radius Recycling has higher upside potential than Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, analysts believe Radius Recycling is more attractive than Universal Stainless & Alloy Products.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.829% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radius Recycling has a beta of 1.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.628%.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radius Recycling offers a yield of 4.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radius Recycling pays out -8.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products quarterly revenues are $87.3M, which are smaller than Radius Recycling quarterly revenues of $673.9M. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's net income of $11.1M is higher than Radius Recycling's net income of -$198.4M. Notably, Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Radius Recycling's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Stainless & Alloy Products is 1.30x versus 0.16x for Radius Recycling. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 12.67% compared to Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's net margin of 7.32%. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's return on equity of 11.36% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 19.51%.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.36%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $139.10 which suggests that it could grow by 20.16%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Universal Stainless & Alloy Products.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.829% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.310, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.033%.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 11.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products quarterly revenues are $87.3M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's net income of $11.1M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $317.8M. Notably, Universal Stainless & Alloy Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Stainless & Alloy Products is 1.30x versus 1.03x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.