TWIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of 1.02% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of 4.95%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.23% beat Cummins's return on equity of 37.07%.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 91.82%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $389.74 which suggests that it could grow by 21.15%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Cummins.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.580, which suggesting that the stock is 42.001% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.2%.

Twin Disc has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Twin Disc pays 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Twin Disc quarterly revenues are $89.9M, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Twin Disc's net income of $919K is lower than Cummins's net income of $418M. Notably, Twin Disc's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.67x while Cummins's PE ratio is 11.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc is 0.34x versus 1.31x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 1.02% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of -20.76%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.23% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 91.82%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.580, which suggesting that the stock is 42.001% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.100, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.973%.

Twin Disc has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Twin Disc pays 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Twin Disc quarterly revenues are $89.9M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Twin Disc's net income of $919K is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Twin Disc's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.67x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc is 0.34x versus 0.47x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a net margin of 1.02% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of --. Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.23% beat Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of --.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 91.82%. On the other hand Hydrogen Engine Center has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.580, which suggesting that the stock is 42.001% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 22.240, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2124.012%.

Twin Disc has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. Hydrogen Engine Center offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twin Disc pays 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrogen Engine Center pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Twin Disc quarterly revenues are $89.9M, which are larger than Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues of --. Twin Disc's net income of $919K is higher than Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of --. Notably, Twin Disc's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.67x while Hydrogen Engine Center's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc is 0.34x versus -- for Hydrogen Engine Center. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power has a net margin of 1.02% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of -219.07%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.23% beat NuScale Power's return on equity of -76.36%.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 91.82%. On the other hand NuScale Power has an analysts' consensus of $24.46 which suggests that it could grow by 39.69%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than NuScale Power.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.580, which suggesting that the stock is 42.001% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Twin Disc has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. NuScale Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twin Disc pays 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Twin Disc quarterly revenues are $89.9M, which are larger than NuScale Power quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Twin Disc's net income of $919K is higher than NuScale Power's net income of -$75M. Notably, Twin Disc's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.67x while NuScale Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc is 0.34x versus 44.07x for NuScale Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.