TRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cass Information Systems has a net margin of 30.75% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of 11.19%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 19.19% beat Cass Information Systems's return on equity of 8.29%.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $172.78, signalling upside risk potential of 1.63%. On the other hand Cass Information Systems has an analysts' consensus of $47.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.12%. Given that Cass Information Systems has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe Cass Information Systems is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.715, which suggesting that the stock is 28.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cass Information Systems has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.987%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Cass Information Systems offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Cass Information Systems pays out 85.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Cass Information Systems quarterly revenues of $41.1M. Thomson Reuters's net income of $587M is higher than Cass Information Systems's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.77x while Cass Information Systems's PE ratio is 30.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 10.57x versus 3.09x for Cass Information Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cintas has a net margin of 30.75% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of 17.51%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 19.19% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.05%.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $172.78, signalling upside risk potential of 1.63%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $195.74 which suggests that it could grow by 2.71%. Given that Cintas has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe Cintas is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.715, which suggesting that the stock is 28.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.413, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.25%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Thomson Reuters's net income of $587M is higher than Cintas's net income of $448.5M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.77x while Cintas's PE ratio is 45.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 10.57x versus 7.90x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enviro Serv has a net margin of 30.75% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of --. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 19.19% beat Enviro Serv's return on equity of --.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $172.78, signalling upside risk potential of 1.63%. On the other hand Enviro Serv has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Enviro Serv, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Enviro Serv.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.715, which suggesting that the stock is 28.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enviro Serv has a beta of 0.524, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.638%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Enviro Serv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Enviro Serv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Enviro Serv quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters's net income of $587M is higher than Enviro Serv's net income of --. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.77x while Enviro Serv's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 10.57x versus -- for Enviro Serv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of 30.75% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of -47.19%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 19.19% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of -15.5%.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $172.78, signalling upside risk potential of 1.63%. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of $11.17 which suggests that it could grow by 65.68%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.715, which suggesting that the stock is 28.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.871%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 8.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $145.6M. Thomson Reuters's net income of $587M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of -$68.7M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.77x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 10.57x versus 0.39x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.