SEAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Digital Ally has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Vivid Seats's net margin of -85.66%. Vivid Seats's return on equity of 6.06% beat Digital Ally's return on equity of -259.6%.

Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 24.36%. On the other hand Digital Ally has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2649.31%. Given that Digital Ally has higher upside potential than Vivid Seats, analysts believe Digital Ally is more attractive than Vivid Seats.

Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digital Ally has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.53%.

Vivid Seats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Digital Ally offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vivid Seats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Digital Ally pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vivid Seats quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are larger than Digital Ally quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Vivid Seats's net income of $5.3M is higher than Digital Ally's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Vivid Seats's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.43x while Digital Ally's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivid Seats is 1.11x versus 0.06x for Digital Ally. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Alphabet has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Vivid Seats's net margin of 29.8%. Vivid Seats's return on equity of 6.06% beat Alphabet's return on equity of 32.19%.

Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 24.36%. On the other hand Alphabet has an analysts' consensus of $211.88 which suggests that it could grow by 9.25%. Given that Vivid Seats has higher upside potential than Alphabet, analysts believe Vivid Seats is more attractive than Alphabet.

Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.965%.

Vivid Seats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alphabet offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Vivid Seats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vivid Seats quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are smaller than Alphabet quarterly revenues of $88.3B. Vivid Seats's net income of $5.3M is lower than Alphabet's net income of $26.3B. Notably, Vivid Seats's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.43x while Alphabet's PE ratio is 25.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivid Seats is 1.11x versus 7.26x for Alphabet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Match Group has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Vivid Seats's net margin of 15.24%. Vivid Seats's return on equity of 6.06% beat Match Group's return on equity of --.

Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 24.36%. On the other hand Match Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.69 which suggests that it could grow by 15.15%. Given that Vivid Seats has higher upside potential than Match Group, analysts believe Vivid Seats is more attractive than Match Group.

Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Match Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vivid Seats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Match Group offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Vivid Seats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Match Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vivid Seats quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are smaller than Match Group quarterly revenues of $895.5M. Vivid Seats's net income of $5.3M is lower than Match Group's net income of $136.5M. Notably, Vivid Seats's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.43x while Match Group's PE ratio is 14.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivid Seats is 1.11x versus 2.55x for Match Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zillow Group has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Vivid Seats's net margin of -3.44%. Vivid Seats's return on equity of 6.06% beat Zillow Group's return on equity of -2.91%.

Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 24.36%. On the other hand Zillow Group has an analysts' consensus of $79.81 which suggests that it could grow by 16.6%. Given that Vivid Seats has higher upside potential than Zillow Group, analysts believe Vivid Seats is more attractive than Zillow Group.

Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zillow Group has a beta of 2.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.572%.

Vivid Seats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zillow Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vivid Seats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zillow Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vivid Seats quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are smaller than Zillow Group quarterly revenues of $581M. Vivid Seats's net income of $5.3M is higher than Zillow Group's net income of -$20M. Notably, Vivid Seats's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.43x while Zillow Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivid Seats is 1.11x versus 7.35x for Zillow Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.