RMBL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genuine Parts has a net margin of -3.8% compared to RumbleON's net margin of 2.31%. RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32% beat Genuine Parts's return on equity of 20.13%.

RumbleON has a consensus price target of $4.67, signalling upside risk potential of 40.14%. On the other hand Genuine Parts has an analysts' consensus of $131.13 which suggests that it could grow by 10.4%. Given that RumbleON has higher upside potential than Genuine Parts, analysts believe RumbleON is more attractive than Genuine Parts.

RumbleON has a beta of 2.167, which suggesting that the stock is 116.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genuine Parts has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.756%.

RumbleON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genuine Parts offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. RumbleON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts pays out 61.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RumbleON quarterly revenues are $295M, which are smaller than Genuine Parts quarterly revenues of $5.8B. RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M is lower than Genuine Parts's net income of $133.1M. Notably, RumbleON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Genuine Parts's PE ratio is 18.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RumbleON is 0.08x versus 0.71x for Genuine Parts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of -3.8% compared to RumbleON's net margin of 1.71%. RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 17.46%.

RumbleON has a consensus price target of $4.67, signalling upside risk potential of 40.14%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $490.22 which suggests that it could grow by 22.45%. Given that RumbleON has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe RumbleON is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

RumbleON has a beta of 2.167, which suggesting that the stock is 116.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.524%.

RumbleON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. RumbleON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RumbleON quarterly revenues are $295M, which are smaller than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.5B. RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M is lower than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $94.8M. Notably, RumbleON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 10.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RumbleON is 0.08x versus 0.27x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of -3.8% compared to RumbleON's net margin of -5.37%. RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -46.15%.

RumbleON has a consensus price target of $4.67, signalling upside risk potential of 40.14%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -49.24%. Given that RumbleON has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe RumbleON is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

RumbleON has a beta of 2.167, which suggesting that the stock is 116.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of -0.040, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.966%.

RumbleON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RumbleON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

RumbleON quarterly revenues are $295M, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $30.2M. RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M is lower than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, RumbleON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RumbleON is 0.08x versus 1.90x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LKQ has a net margin of -3.8% compared to RumbleON's net margin of 4.65%. RumbleON's return on equity of -173.32% beat LKQ's return on equity of 11.21%.

RumbleON has a consensus price target of $4.67, signalling upside risk potential of 40.14%. On the other hand LKQ has an analysts' consensus of $51.54 which suggests that it could grow by 27.57%. Given that RumbleON has higher upside potential than LKQ, analysts believe RumbleON is more attractive than LKQ.

RumbleON has a beta of 2.167, which suggesting that the stock is 116.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LKQ has a beta of 1.276, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.583%.

RumbleON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LKQ offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. RumbleON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LKQ pays out 46.09% of its earnings as a dividend. LKQ's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RumbleON quarterly revenues are $295M, which are smaller than LKQ quarterly revenues of $3.4B. RumbleON's net income of -$11.2M is lower than LKQ's net income of $156M. Notably, RumbleON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LKQ's PE ratio is 15.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RumbleON is 0.08x versus 0.74x for LKQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.