RIOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of -182.06% compared to Riot Platforms's net margin of 6.26%. Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 20.89%.

Riot Platforms has a consensus price target of $17.90, signalling upside risk potential of 44.24%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $293.88 which suggests that it could grow by 11.18%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.216, which suggesting that the stock is 321.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Riot Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riot Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riot Platforms quarterly revenues are $84.8M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $75.5M. Notably, Riot Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.05x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 44.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riot Platforms is 9.98x versus 14.06x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -182.06% compared to Riot Platforms's net margin of 1.53%. Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56% beat Hut 8's return on equity of 40.35%.

Riot Platforms has a consensus price target of $17.90, signalling upside risk potential of 44.24%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $33.63 which suggests that it could grow by 34.59%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Hut 8, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Hut 8.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.216, which suggesting that the stock is 321.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.637, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 263.663%.

Riot Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riot Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riot Platforms quarterly revenues are $84.8M, which are larger than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of $42.2M. Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M is lower than Hut 8's net income of $647K. Notably, Riot Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.05x while Hut 8's PE ratio is 12.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riot Platforms is 9.98x versus 6.47x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -182.06% compared to Riot Platforms's net margin of -94.79%. Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 7.75%.

Riot Platforms has a consensus price target of $17.90, signalling upside risk potential of 44.24%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $27.33 which suggests that it could grow by 43.33%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.216, which suggesting that the stock is 321.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 5.765, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 476.509%.

Riot Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riot Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riot Platforms quarterly revenues are $84.8M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $131.6M. Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M is lower than MARA Holdings's net income of -$124.8M. Notably, Riot Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.05x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 21.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riot Platforms is 9.98x versus 8.66x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of -182.06% compared to Riot Platforms's net margin of -84.01%. Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56% beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09%.

Riot Platforms has a consensus price target of $17.90, signalling upside risk potential of 44.24%. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 63.13%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.216, which suggesting that the stock is 321.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 2.612, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.2%.

Riot Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riot Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riot Platforms quarterly revenues are $84.8M, which are larger than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $27.1M. Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M is lower than TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M. Notably, Riot Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.05x while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riot Platforms is 9.98x versus 15.21x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.