RDFN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Castle has a net margin of -14.89% compared to Redfin's net margin of -289.15%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Crown Castle's return on equity of -83.96%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $10.58, signalling upside risk potential of 23.38%. On the other hand Crown Castle has an analysts' consensus of $110.18 which suggests that it could grow by 8.82%. Given that Redfin has higher upside potential than Crown Castle, analysts believe Redfin is more attractive than Crown Castle.

Redfin has a beta of 2.565, which suggesting that the stock is 156.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Castle has a beta of 0.931, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.892%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crown Castle offers a yield of 6.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share. Redfin pays -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle pays out -69.92% of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are smaller than Crown Castle quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Redfin's net income of -$36.4M is higher than Crown Castle's net income of -$4.8B. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crown Castle's PE ratio is 33.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.00x versus 6.71x for Crown Castle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a net margin of -14.89% compared to Redfin's net margin of -2.27%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Chatham Lodging Trust's return on equity of 0.52%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $10.58, signalling upside risk potential of 23.38%. On the other hand Chatham Lodging Trust has an analysts' consensus of $9.83 which suggests that it could grow by 42.93%. Given that Chatham Lodging Trust has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Chatham Lodging Trust is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.565, which suggesting that the stock is 156.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.004%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chatham Lodging Trust offers a yield of 4.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Redfin pays -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Chatham Lodging Trust pays out 535.96% of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are larger than Chatham Lodging Trust quarterly revenues of $75.1M. Redfin's net income of -$36.4M is lower than Chatham Lodging Trust's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chatham Lodging Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.00x versus 1.06x for Chatham Lodging Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eXp World Holdings has a net margin of -14.89% compared to Redfin's net margin of -0.87%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat eXp World Holdings's return on equity of -9.64%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $10.58, signalling upside risk potential of 23.38%. On the other hand eXp World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $14.75 which suggests that it could grow by 64.25%. Given that eXp World Holdings has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe eXp World Holdings is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.565, which suggesting that the stock is 156.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings has a beta of 2.444, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.446%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eXp World Holdings offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Redfin pays -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings pays out -141.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Redfin's net income of -$36.4M is lower than eXp World Holdings's net income of -$9.5M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while eXp World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.00x versus 0.30x for eXp World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opendoor Technologies has a net margin of -14.89% compared to Redfin's net margin of -10.42%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Opendoor Technologies's return on equity of -46.39%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $10.58, signalling upside risk potential of 23.38%. On the other hand Opendoor Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $1.39 which suggests that it could grow by 49.83%. Given that Opendoor Technologies has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Opendoor Technologies is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.565, which suggesting that the stock is 156.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Opendoor Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Redfin pays -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Opendoor Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are smaller than Opendoor Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Redfin's net income of -$36.4M is higher than Opendoor Technologies's net income of -$113M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Opendoor Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.00x versus 0.13x for Opendoor Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.