PLAB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FormFactor has a net margin of 20.2% compared to Photronics's net margin of 5.12%. Photronics's return on equity of 10.37% beat FormFactor's return on equity of 7.43%.

Photronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.91%. On the other hand FormFactor has an analysts' consensus of $42.22 which suggests that it could grow by 57.84%. Given that Photronics has higher upside potential than FormFactor, analysts believe Photronics is more attractive than FormFactor.

Photronics has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FormFactor has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.266%.

Photronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FormFactor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Photronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FormFactor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Photronics quarterly revenues are $212.1M, which are larger than FormFactor quarterly revenues of $189.5M. Photronics's net income of $42.9M is higher than FormFactor's net income of $9.7M. Notably, Photronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while FormFactor's PE ratio is 30.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Photronics is 1.31x versus 2.75x for FormFactor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IPG Photonics has a net margin of 20.2% compared to Photronics's net margin of 3.34%. Photronics's return on equity of 10.37% beat IPG Photonics's return on equity of -8.14%.

Photronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.91%. On the other hand IPG Photonics has an analysts' consensus of $73.33 which suggests that it could grow by 36.38%. Given that Photronics has higher upside potential than IPG Photonics, analysts believe Photronics is more attractive than IPG Photonics.

Photronics has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IPG Photonics has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.477%.

Photronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IPG Photonics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Photronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IPG Photonics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Photronics quarterly revenues are $212.1M, which are smaller than IPG Photonics quarterly revenues of $234.3M. Photronics's net income of $42.9M is higher than IPG Photonics's net income of $7.8M. Notably, Photronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while IPG Photonics's PE ratio is 22.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Photronics is 1.31x versus 2.44x for IPG Photonics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kulicke & Soffa Industries has a net margin of 20.2% compared to Photronics's net margin of 49.15%. Photronics's return on equity of 10.37% beat Kulicke & Soffa Industries's return on equity of 0.33%.

Photronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.91%. On the other hand Kulicke & Soffa Industries has an analysts' consensus of $51.00 which suggests that it could grow by 70.74%. Given that Photronics has higher upside potential than Kulicke & Soffa Industries, analysts believe Photronics is more attractive than Kulicke & Soffa Industries.

Photronics has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kulicke & Soffa Industries has a beta of 1.500, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.044%.

Photronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kulicke & Soffa Industries offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Photronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kulicke & Soffa Industries pays out -64% of its earnings as a dividend.

Photronics quarterly revenues are $212.1M, which are larger than Kulicke & Soffa Industries quarterly revenues of $166.1M. Photronics's net income of $42.9M is lower than Kulicke & Soffa Industries's net income of $81.6M. Notably, Photronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while Kulicke & Soffa Industries's PE ratio is 248.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Photronics is 1.31x versus 2.35x for Kulicke & Soffa Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 20.2% compared to Photronics's net margin of 11.02%. Photronics's return on equity of 10.37% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Photronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.91%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $109.90 which suggests that it could grow by 105.85%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Photronics, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Photronics.

Photronics has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

Photronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Photronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Photronics quarterly revenues are $212.1M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Photronics's net income of $42.9M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Photronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.68x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Photronics is 1.31x versus 8.01x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.