PBYI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nanoviricides has a net margin of 32.68% compared to Puma Biotechnology's net margin of --. Puma Biotechnology's return on equity of 47.89% beat Nanoviricides's return on equity of --.

Puma Biotechnology has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 44.44%. On the other hand Nanoviricides has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 357.75%. Given that Nanoviricides has higher upside potential than Puma Biotechnology, analysts believe Nanoviricides is more attractive than Puma Biotechnology.

Puma Biotechnology has a beta of 1.342, which suggesting that the stock is 34.176% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nanoviricides has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.287%.

Puma Biotechnology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nanoviricides offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Puma Biotechnology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nanoviricides pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Puma Biotechnology quarterly revenues are $59.1M, which are larger than Nanoviricides quarterly revenues of --. Puma Biotechnology's net income of $19.3M is higher than Nanoviricides's net income of -$2M. Notably, Puma Biotechnology's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Nanoviricides's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puma Biotechnology is 0.63x versus -- for Nanoviricides. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oragenics has a net margin of 32.68% compared to Puma Biotechnology's net margin of --. Puma Biotechnology's return on equity of 47.89% beat Oragenics's return on equity of --.

Puma Biotechnology has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 44.44%. On the other hand Oragenics has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 407.61%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than Puma Biotechnology, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than Puma Biotechnology.

Puma Biotechnology has a beta of 1.342, which suggesting that the stock is 34.176% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oragenics has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.16%.

Puma Biotechnology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oragenics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Puma Biotechnology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oragenics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Puma Biotechnology quarterly revenues are $59.1M, which are larger than Oragenics quarterly revenues of --. Puma Biotechnology's net income of $19.3M is higher than Oragenics's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Puma Biotechnology's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Oragenics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puma Biotechnology is 0.63x versus 1.23x for Oragenics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palatin Technologies has a net margin of 32.68% compared to Puma Biotechnology's net margin of --. Puma Biotechnology's return on equity of 47.89% beat Palatin Technologies's return on equity of --.

Puma Biotechnology has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 44.44%. On the other hand Palatin Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3281.64%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Puma Biotechnology, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Puma Biotechnology.

Puma Biotechnology has a beta of 1.342, which suggesting that the stock is 34.176% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.45%.

Puma Biotechnology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palatin Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Puma Biotechnology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palatin Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Puma Biotechnology quarterly revenues are $59.1M, which are larger than Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Puma Biotechnology's net income of $19.3M is higher than Palatin Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Puma Biotechnology's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Palatin Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puma Biotechnology is 0.63x versus -- for Palatin Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of 32.68% compared to Puma Biotechnology's net margin of --. Puma Biotechnology's return on equity of 47.89% beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

Puma Biotechnology has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 44.44%. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 322.27%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than Puma Biotechnology, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than Puma Biotechnology.

Puma Biotechnology has a beta of 1.342, which suggesting that the stock is 34.176% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 1.169, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.92%.

Puma Biotechnology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Puma Biotechnology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Puma Biotechnology quarterly revenues are $59.1M, which are larger than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. Puma Biotechnology's net income of $19.3M is higher than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Puma Biotechnology's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puma Biotechnology is 0.63x versus 0.63x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.