NWFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Financial Bancorp has a net margin of 21.09% compared to Norwood Financial's net margin of 26.06%. Norwood Financial's return on equity of 7.1% beat First Financial Bancorp's return on equity of 9.63%.

Norwood Financial has a consensus price target of $29.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12%. On the other hand First Financial Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $30.38 which suggests that it could grow by 14.8%. Given that First Financial Bancorp has higher upside potential than Norwood Financial, analysts believe First Financial Bancorp is more attractive than Norwood Financial.

Norwood Financial has a beta of 0.619, which suggesting that the stock is 38.123% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Financial Bancorp has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.289%.

Norwood Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.56%. First Financial Bancorp offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Norwood Financial pays 56.19% of its earnings as a dividend. First Financial Bancorp pays out 34.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Norwood Financial quarterly revenues are $18.2M, which are smaller than First Financial Bancorp quarterly revenues of $201.3M. Norwood Financial's net income of $3.8M is lower than First Financial Bancorp's net income of $52.5M. Notably, Norwood Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.57x while First Financial Bancorp's PE ratio is 11.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwood Financial is 3.06x versus 3.11x for First Financial Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntington Bancshares has a net margin of 21.09% compared to Norwood Financial's net margin of 27.59%. Norwood Financial's return on equity of 7.1% beat Huntington Bancshares's return on equity of 8.48%.

Norwood Financial has a consensus price target of $29.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12%. On the other hand Huntington Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $18.66 which suggests that it could grow by 13.58%. Given that Huntington Bancshares has higher upside potential than Norwood Financial, analysts believe Huntington Bancshares is more attractive than Norwood Financial.

Norwood Financial has a beta of 0.619, which suggesting that the stock is 38.123% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Bancshares has a beta of 1.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.262%.

Norwood Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.56%. Huntington Bancshares offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Norwood Financial pays 56.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Bancshares pays out 53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Norwood Financial quarterly revenues are $18.2M, which are smaller than Huntington Bancshares quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Norwood Financial's net income of $3.8M is lower than Huntington Bancshares's net income of $517M. Notably, Norwood Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.57x while Huntington Bancshares's PE ratio is 15.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwood Financial is 3.06x versus 3.36x for Huntington Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Virginia National Bankshares has a net margin of 21.09% compared to Norwood Financial's net margin of 34.14%. Norwood Financial's return on equity of 7.1% beat Virginia National Bankshares's return on equity of 10.23%.

Norwood Financial has a consensus price target of $29.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12%. On the other hand Virginia National Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Norwood Financial has higher upside potential than Virginia National Bankshares, analysts believe Norwood Financial is more attractive than Virginia National Bankshares.

Norwood Financial has a beta of 0.619, which suggesting that the stock is 38.123% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Virginia National Bankshares has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.089%.

Norwood Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.56%. Virginia National Bankshares offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Norwood Financial pays 56.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Virginia National Bankshares pays out 36.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Norwood Financial quarterly revenues are $18.2M, which are larger than Virginia National Bankshares quarterly revenues of $13.5M. Norwood Financial's net income of $3.8M is lower than Virginia National Bankshares's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Norwood Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.57x while Virginia National Bankshares's PE ratio is 12.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwood Financial is 3.06x versus 3.60x for Virginia National Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wesbanco has a net margin of 21.09% compared to Norwood Financial's net margin of 24.98%. Norwood Financial's return on equity of 7.1% beat Wesbanco's return on equity of 5.32%.

Norwood Financial has a consensus price target of $29.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12%. On the other hand Wesbanco has an analysts' consensus of $39.57 which suggests that it could grow by 25.78%. Given that Wesbanco has higher upside potential than Norwood Financial, analysts believe Wesbanco is more attractive than Norwood Financial.

Norwood Financial has a beta of 0.619, which suggesting that the stock is 38.123% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wesbanco has a beta of 0.848, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.204%.

Norwood Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.56%. Wesbanco offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Norwood Financial pays 56.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Wesbanco pays out 58.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Norwood Financial quarterly revenues are $18.2M, which are smaller than Wesbanco quarterly revenues of $149.2M. Norwood Financial's net income of $3.8M is lower than Wesbanco's net income of $37.3M. Notably, Norwood Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.57x while Wesbanco's PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwood Financial is 3.06x versus 3.27x for Wesbanco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.