NTRB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NeuroOne Medical Technologies has a net margin of -211% compared to Nutriband's net margin of 54.53%. Nutriband's return on equity of -69.58% beat NeuroOne Medical Technologies's return on equity of -238.93%.

Nutriband has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 160%. On the other hand NeuroOne Medical Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 354.55%. Given that NeuroOne Medical Technologies has higher upside potential than Nutriband, analysts believe NeuroOne Medical Technologies is more attractive than Nutriband.

Nutriband has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.944% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeuroOne Medical Technologies has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.823%.

Nutriband has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NeuroOne Medical Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutriband pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NeuroOne Medical Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutriband quarterly revenues are $645.8K, which are smaller than NeuroOne Medical Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Nutriband's net income of -$1.4M is lower than NeuroOne Medical Technologies's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Nutriband's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NeuroOne Medical Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutriband is 24.51x versus 2.18x for NeuroOne Medical Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

enVVeno Medical has a net margin of -211% compared to Nutriband's net margin of --. Nutriband's return on equity of -69.58% beat enVVeno Medical's return on equity of --.

Nutriband has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 160%. On the other hand enVVeno Medical has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 678.3%. Given that enVVeno Medical has higher upside potential than Nutriband, analysts believe enVVeno Medical is more attractive than Nutriband.

Nutriband has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.944% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison enVVeno Medical has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.991%.

Nutriband has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. enVVeno Medical offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutriband pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. enVVeno Medical pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutriband quarterly revenues are $645.8K, which are larger than enVVeno Medical quarterly revenues of --. Nutriband's net income of -$1.4M is higher than enVVeno Medical's net income of -$6.2M. Notably, Nutriband's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while enVVeno Medical's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutriband is 24.51x versus 194.62x for enVVeno Medical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SINTX Technologies has a net margin of -211% compared to Nutriband's net margin of -882.81%. Nutriband's return on equity of -69.58% beat SINTX Technologies's return on equity of -148.9%.

Nutriband has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 160%. On the other hand SINTX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $300.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3489.74%. Given that SINTX Technologies has higher upside potential than Nutriband, analysts believe SINTX Technologies is more attractive than Nutriband.

Nutriband has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.944% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SINTX Technologies has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.355%.

Nutriband has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SINTX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutriband pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SINTX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutriband quarterly revenues are $645.8K, which are larger than SINTX Technologies quarterly revenues of $192K. Nutriband's net income of -$1.4M is higher than SINTX Technologies's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Nutriband's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SINTX Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutriband is 24.51x versus 1.22x for SINTX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Beyond Air has a net margin of -211% compared to Nutriband's net margin of -1215.67%. Nutriband's return on equity of -69.58% beat Beyond Air's return on equity of -225.36%.

Nutriband has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 160%. On the other hand Beyond Air has an analysts' consensus of $2.25 which suggests that it could grow by 946.51%. Given that Beyond Air has higher upside potential than Nutriband, analysts believe Beyond Air is more attractive than Nutriband.

Nutriband has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.944% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beyond Air has a beta of 0.154, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.617%.

Nutriband has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Beyond Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutriband pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Beyond Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutriband quarterly revenues are $645.8K, which are smaller than Beyond Air quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Nutriband's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Beyond Air's net income of -$13M. Notably, Nutriband's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Beyond Air's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutriband is 24.51x versus 3.88x for Beyond Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.