MULN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of -3933.89% compared to Mullen Automotive's net margin of --. Mullen Automotive's return on equity of -770.14% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Mullen Automotive has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mullen Automotive has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Mullen Automotive is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Mullen Automotive has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mullen Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mullen Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mullen Automotive quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Mullen Automotive's net income of -$114.9M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Mullen Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mullen Automotive is 0.00x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a net margin of -3933.89% compared to Mullen Automotive's net margin of 1.54%. Mullen Automotive's return on equity of -770.14% beat Goodyear Tire & Rubber's return on equity of 1.44%.

Mullen Automotive has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Goodyear Tire & Rubber has an analysts' consensus of $11.54 which suggests that it could grow by 19.59%. Given that Goodyear Tire & Rubber has higher upside potential than Mullen Automotive, analysts believe Goodyear Tire & Rubber is more attractive than Mullen Automotive.

Mullen Automotive has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.854%.

Mullen Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goodyear Tire & Rubber offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mullen Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goodyear Tire & Rubber pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mullen Automotive quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are smaller than Goodyear Tire & Rubber quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Mullen Automotive's net income of -$114.9M is lower than Goodyear Tire & Rubber's net income of $76M. Notably, Mullen Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goodyear Tire & Rubber's PE ratio is 40.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mullen Automotive is 0.00x versus 0.15x for Goodyear Tire & Rubber. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MillerKnoll has a net margin of -3933.89% compared to Mullen Automotive's net margin of -1.45%. Mullen Automotive's return on equity of -770.14% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity of 2.13%.

Mullen Automotive has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MillerKnoll has an analysts' consensus of $30.50 which suggests that it could grow by 94.52%. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Mullen Automotive, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Mullen Automotive.

Mullen Automotive has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.388%.

Mullen Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MillerKnoll offers a yield of 4.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Mullen Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll pays out 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mullen Automotive quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are smaller than MillerKnoll quarterly revenues of $876.2M. Mullen Automotive's net income of -$114.9M is lower than MillerKnoll's net income of -$12.7M. Notably, Mullen Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MillerKnoll's PE ratio is 37.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mullen Automotive is 0.00x versus 0.31x for MillerKnoll. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of -3933.89% compared to Mullen Automotive's net margin of -46.97%. Mullen Automotive's return on equity of -770.14% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Mullen Automotive has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 560.38%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Mullen Automotive, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Mullen Automotive.

Mullen Automotive has a beta of 2.544, which suggesting that the stock is 154.379% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.56%.

Mullen Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mullen Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mullen Automotive quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Mullen Automotive's net income of -$114.9M is lower than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Mullen Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mullen Automotive is 0.00x versus 1.26x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.