MPAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Motorcar Parts of America's net margin of -23.71%. Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -6.4% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -16.73%.

Motorcar Parts of America has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 59.45%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 443.48%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Motorcar Parts of America, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Motorcar Parts of America.

Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.292, which suggesting that the stock is 29.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.1%.

Motorcar Parts of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorcar Parts of America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues are $186.2M, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $163.3M. Motorcar Parts of America's net income of $2.3M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$38.7M. Notably, Motorcar Parts of America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorcar Parts of America is 0.23x versus 0.04x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Motorcar Parts of America's net margin of --. Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -6.4% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Motorcar Parts of America has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 59.45%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Motorcar Parts of America has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Motorcar Parts of America is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.292, which suggesting that the stock is 29.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Motorcar Parts of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorcar Parts of America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues are $186.2M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Motorcar Parts of America's net income of $2.3M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Motorcar Parts of America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorcar Parts of America is 0.23x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Motorcar Parts of America's net margin of --. Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -6.4% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Motorcar Parts of America has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 59.45%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53.85%. Given that Motorcar Parts of America has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Motorcar Parts of America is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.292, which suggesting that the stock is 29.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.799%.

Motorcar Parts of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorcar Parts of America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues are $186.2M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Motorcar Parts of America's net income of $2.3M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Motorcar Parts of America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorcar Parts of America is 0.23x versus 117.51x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Motorcar Parts of America's net margin of -46.97%. Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -6.4% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Motorcar Parts of America has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 59.45%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 548.15%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Motorcar Parts of America, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Motorcar Parts of America.

Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.292, which suggesting that the stock is 29.186% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.56%.

Motorcar Parts of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Motorcar Parts of America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues are $186.2M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Motorcar Parts of America's net income of $2.3M is higher than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Motorcar Parts of America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Motorcar Parts of America is 0.23x versus 1.28x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.