LOCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cava Group has a net margin of 5.14% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 7.37%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.49% beat Cava Group's return on equity of 9.18%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.32%. On the other hand Cava Group has an analysts' consensus of $156.62 which suggests that it could grow by 38.84%. Given that Cava Group has higher upside potential than El Pollo Loco Holdings, analysts believe Cava Group is more attractive than El Pollo Loco Holdings.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.468, which suggesting that the stock is 46.76% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cava Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cava Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cava Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $120.4M, which are smaller than Cava Group quarterly revenues of $243.8M. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6.2M is lower than Cava Group's net income of $18M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.61x while Cava Group's PE ratio is 245.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.75x versus 14.46x for Cava Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 5.14% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 3.38%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.49% beat Brinker International's return on equity of --.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.32%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $113.38 which suggests that it could fall by -10.28%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Brinker International.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.468, which suggesting that the stock is 46.76% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.523, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.255%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $120.4M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6.2M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $38.5M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.61x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 32.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.75x versus 1.33x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA has a net margin of 5.14% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of -7.88%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.49% beat Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -5.35%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.32%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA has an analysts' consensus of $104.75 which suggests that it could grow by 15.64%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Kura Sushi USA, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Kura Sushi USA.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.468, which suggesting that the stock is 46.76% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.841, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.106%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kura Sushi USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $120.4M, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues of $66M. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6.2M is higher than Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$5.2M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.61x while Kura Sushi USA's PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.75x versus 4.27x for Kura Sushi USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 5.14% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 20.92%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.49% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.32%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $145.81 which suggests that it could grow by 7.24%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Yum Brands.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.468, which suggesting that the stock is 46.76% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.554%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 42.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $120.4M, which are smaller than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6.2M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $382M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.61x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 25.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.75x versus 5.29x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.