LMFA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Encore Capital Group has a net margin of -490.99% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -84.82%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -32.38% beat Encore Capital Group's return on equity of -14.83%.

LM Funding America has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 287.93%. On the other hand Encore Capital Group has an analysts' consensus of $59.75 which suggests that it could grow by 102.47%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than Encore Capital Group, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than Encore Capital Group.

LM Funding America has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Encore Capital Group has a beta of 1.578, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.77%.

LM Funding America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Encore Capital Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LM Funding America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Encore Capital Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LM Funding America quarterly revenues are $956.9K, which are smaller than Encore Capital Group quarterly revenues of $265.6M. LM Funding America's net income of -$4.7M is higher than Encore Capital Group's net income of -$225.3M. Notably, LM Funding America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Encore Capital Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America is 0.19x versus 0.54x for Encore Capital Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a net margin of -490.99% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of 67.83%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -32.38% beat Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's return on equity of 5.19%.

LM Funding America has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 287.93%. On the other hand Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has an analysts' consensus of $16.17 which suggests that it could grow by 42.56%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP.

LM Funding America has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a beta of 0.532, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.76%.

LM Funding America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP offers a yield of 13.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. LM Funding America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP pays out 175.97% of its earnings as a dividend.

LM Funding America quarterly revenues are $956.9K, which are smaller than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP quarterly revenues of $14.9M. LM Funding America's net income of -$4.7M is lower than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net income of $10.1M. Notably, LM Funding America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's PE ratio is 14.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America is 0.19x versus 6.54x for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Navient has a net margin of -490.99% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of 9.56%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -32.38% beat Navient's return on equity of 4.81%.

LM Funding America has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 287.93%. On the other hand Navient has an analysts' consensus of $13.10 which suggests that it could grow by 18.34%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than Navient, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than Navient.

LM Funding America has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navient has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.343%.

LM Funding America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Navient offers a yield of 5.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. LM Funding America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient pays out 53.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LM Funding America quarterly revenues are $956.9K, which are smaller than Navient quarterly revenues of $251M. LM Funding America's net income of -$4.7M is lower than Navient's net income of $24M. Notably, LM Funding America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Navient's PE ratio is 9.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America is 0.19x versus 1.27x for Navient. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of -490.99% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of 13.4%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -32.38% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 20.14%.

LM Funding America has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 287.93%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $87.06 which suggests that it could grow by 44.71%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than PayPal Holdings, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than PayPal Holdings.

LM Funding America has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.467%.

LM Funding America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LM Funding America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LM Funding America quarterly revenues are $956.9K, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.4B. LM Funding America's net income of -$4.7M is lower than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1.1B. Notably, LM Funding America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 15.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America is 0.19x versus 1.97x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.