LE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gap has a net margin of -0.19% compared to Lands' End's net margin of 7.16%. Lands' End's return on equity of -8.88% beat Gap's return on equity of 29.82%.

Lands' End has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42%. On the other hand Gap has an analysts' consensus of $28.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.24%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Gap, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Gap.

Lands' End has a beta of 2.746, which suggesting that the stock is 174.58% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gap has a beta of 2.369, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.854%.

Lands' End has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gap offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Lands' End pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gap pays out 44.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Gap's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lands' End quarterly revenues are $318.6M, which are smaller than Gap quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Lands' End's net income of -$593K is lower than Gap's net income of $274M. Notably, Lands' End's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gap's PE ratio is 11.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lands' End is 0.29x versus 0.60x for Gap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordstrom has a net margin of -0.19% compared to Lands' End's net margin of 1.33%. Lands' End's return on equity of -8.88% beat Nordstrom's return on equity of 30.24%.

Lands' End has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42%. On the other hand Nordstrom has an analysts' consensus of $22.80 which suggests that it could fall by -5.47%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Nordstrom, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Nordstrom.

Lands' End has a beta of 2.746, which suggesting that the stock is 174.58% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordstrom has a beta of 2.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.521%.

Lands' End has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nordstrom offers a yield of 3.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Lands' End pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom pays out 91.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordstrom's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lands' End quarterly revenues are $318.6M, which are smaller than Nordstrom quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Lands' End's net income of -$593K is lower than Nordstrom's net income of $46M. Notably, Lands' End's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nordstrom's PE ratio is 15.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lands' End is 0.29x versus 0.27x for Nordstrom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of -0.19% compared to Lands' End's net margin of 9.64%. Lands' End's return on equity of -8.88% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 42.62%.

Lands' End has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $168.39 which suggests that it could grow by 11.1%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Ross Stores, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Ross Stores.

Lands' End has a beta of 2.746, which suggesting that the stock is 174.58% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.503%.

Lands' End has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Lands' End pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lands' End quarterly revenues are $318.6M, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Lands' End's net income of -$593K is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $488.8M. Notably, Lands' End's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 23.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lands' End is 0.29x versus 2.37x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of -0.19% compared to Lands' End's net margin of 7.56%. Lands' End's return on equity of -8.88% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 15.11%.

Lands' End has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $47.08 which suggests that it could fall by -16.96%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Lands' End has a beta of 2.746, which suggesting that the stock is 174.58% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.554, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.402%.

Lands' End has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lands' End pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lands' End quarterly revenues are $318.6M, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Lands' End's net income of -$593K is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $102.9M. Notably, Lands' End's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 16.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lands' End is 0.29x versus 0.99x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.