KINS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CorVel has a net margin of 12.92% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of 10.43%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 38.66% beat CorVel's return on equity of 33.19%.

Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.95%. On the other hand CorVel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingstone Companies has higher upside potential than CorVel, analysts believe Kingstone Companies is more attractive than CorVel.

Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.481, which suggesting that the stock is 51.89% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.112%.

Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CorVel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $42.1M, which are smaller than CorVel quarterly revenues of $228M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $5.4M is lower than CorVel's net income of $23.8M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.11x while CorVel's PE ratio is 68.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.39x versus 6.99x for CorVel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eHealth has a net margin of 12.92% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of 30.93%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 38.66% beat eHealth's return on equity of 1.6%.

Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.95%. On the other hand eHealth has an analysts' consensus of $10.63 which suggests that it could grow by 78.27%. Given that eHealth has higher upside potential than Kingstone Companies, analysts believe eHealth is more attractive than Kingstone Companies.

Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.481, which suggesting that the stock is 51.89% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eHealth has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.024%.

Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eHealth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth pays out 55.3% of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $42.1M, which are smaller than eHealth quarterly revenues of $315.2M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $5.4M is lower than eHealth's net income of $97.5M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.11x while eHealth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.39x versus 0.33x for eHealth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance has a net margin of 12.92% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of 15.82%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 38.66% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 228.38%.

Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.95%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance has an analysts' consensus of $117.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.84%. Given that Kingstone Companies has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, analysts believe Kingstone Companies is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance.

Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.481, which suggesting that the stock is 51.89% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.556%.

Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goosehead Insurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $42.1M, which are smaller than Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues of $93.9M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $5.4M is lower than Goosehead Insurance's net income of $14.9M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.11x while Goosehead Insurance's PE ratio is 94.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.39x versus 13.21x for Goosehead Insurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance Global Group has a net margin of 12.92% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of -42.41%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 38.66% beat Reliance Global Group's return on equity of -254.59%.

Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.95%. On the other hand Reliance Global Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11509.76%. Given that Reliance Global Group has higher upside potential than Kingstone Companies, analysts believe Reliance Global Group is more attractive than Kingstone Companies.

Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.481, which suggesting that the stock is 51.89% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance Global Group has a beta of -0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.907%.

Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reliance Global Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance Global Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $42.1M, which are larger than Reliance Global Group quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $5.4M is higher than Reliance Global Group's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.11x while Reliance Global Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.39x versus 0.08x for Reliance Global Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.