IREN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Computershare has a net margin of 16.06% compared to IREN's net margin of --. IREN's return on equity of -5.61% beat Computershare's return on equity of 26.84%.

IREN has a consensus price target of $20.30, signalling upside risk potential of 260.49%. On the other hand Computershare has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Computershare, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Computershare.

IREN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Computershare has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.395%.

IREN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Computershare offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. IREN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare pays out 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IREN quarterly revenues are $117.5M, which are larger than Computershare quarterly revenues of --. IREN's net income of $18.9M is higher than Computershare's net income of --. Notably, IREN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Computershare's PE ratio is 25.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IREN is 3.51x versus 4.59x for Computershare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a net margin of 16.06% compared to IREN's net margin of --. IREN's return on equity of -5.61% beat Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22%.

IREN has a consensus price target of $20.30, signalling upside risk potential of 260.49%. On the other hand Commonwealth Bank of Australia has an analysts' consensus of $74.40 which suggests that it could fall by -24.84%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Commonwealth Bank of Australia, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

IREN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.457%.

IREN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commonwealth Bank of Australia offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share. IREN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays out 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IREN quarterly revenues are $117.5M, which are larger than Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues of --. IREN's net income of $18.9M is higher than Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of --. Notably, IREN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commonwealth Bank of Australia's PE ratio is 25.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IREN is 3.51x versus 9.39x for Commonwealth Bank of Australia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Macquarie Group has a net margin of 16.06% compared to IREN's net margin of --. IREN's return on equity of -5.61% beat Macquarie Group's return on equity of 11.18%.

IREN has a consensus price target of $20.30, signalling upside risk potential of 260.49%. On the other hand Macquarie Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Macquarie Group.

IREN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.484, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.368%.

IREN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Macquarie Group offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. IREN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group pays out 75.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IREN quarterly revenues are $117.5M, which are larger than Macquarie Group quarterly revenues of --. IREN's net income of $18.9M is higher than Macquarie Group's net income of --. Notably, IREN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Macquarie Group's PE ratio is 19.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IREN is 3.51x versus 9.93x for Macquarie Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIPP International Industries has a net margin of 16.06% compared to IREN's net margin of --. IREN's return on equity of -5.61% beat SIPP International Industries's return on equity of --.

IREN has a consensus price target of $20.30, signalling upside risk potential of 260.49%. On the other hand SIPP International Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than SIPP International Industries, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than SIPP International Industries.

IREN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIPP International Industries has a beta of 0.515, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.536%.

IREN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIPP International Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IREN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIPP International Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IREN quarterly revenues are $117.5M, which are larger than SIPP International Industries quarterly revenues of --. IREN's net income of $18.9M is higher than SIPP International Industries's net income of --. Notably, IREN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIPP International Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IREN is 3.51x versus -- for SIPP International Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.