Financhill
Sell
41

IPHA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$1.99
Seasonality move :
-11.27%
Day range:
$1.91 - $1.97
52-week range:
$1.29 - $3.51
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
11.60x
P/B ratio:
17.69x
Volume:
9.2K
Avg. volume:
22.4K
1-year change:
-25.1%
Market cap:
$162.6M
Revenue:
$13.7M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.45

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
IPHA
Innate Pharma SA
-- -- -- -- $8.02
CLLS
Cellectis SA
$13.8M -- 204.72% -100% $5.80
DBVT
DBV Technologies SA
$501.4K -$0.24 -- -82.82% $22.63
EDAP
Edap TMS SA
$16.6M -$0.17 1.37% -27.74% $8.50
GNFT
Genfit SA
$143.7M -- -- -- $10.17
SNY
Sanofi SA
$11.1B $0.95 -6.74% 98.89% $63.97
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
IPHA
Innate Pharma SA
$1.94 $8.02 $162.6M -- $0.00 0% 11.60x
CLLS
Cellectis SA
$1.43 $5.80 $143.1M -- $0.00 0% 3.39x
DBVT
DBV Technologies SA
$7.91 $22.63 $216.2M -- $0.00 0% --
EDAP
Edap TMS SA
$1.31 $8.50 $49M -- $0.00 0% 0.71x
GNFT
Genfit SA
$3.51 $10.17 $175.2M 32.57x $0.00 0% 5.83x
SNY
Sanofi SA
$50.56 $63.97 $126.8B 20.24x $2.04 7.79% 2.64x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
IPHA
Innate Pharma SA
55.22% 0.339 24.23% 2.76x
CLLS
Cellectis SA
27.15% 1.155 37.63% 1.70x
DBVT
DBV Technologies SA
-- -2.465 -- --
EDAP
Edap TMS SA
20.91% -0.529 13.72% 1.33x
GNFT
Genfit SA
-- 0.780 -- --
SNY
Sanofi SA
17.11% 0.103 13.73% 0.64x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
IPHA
Innate Pharma SA
-- -- -39.78% -72.79% -- --
CLLS
Cellectis SA
-- -$10.7M -22.9% -31.46% 65.62% -$1.8M
DBVT
DBV Technologies SA
-- -$23.8M -- -- -- -$9.8M
EDAP
Edap TMS SA
$9.7M -$4M -35.42% -39.5% -8.35% $246.1K
GNFT
Genfit SA
-- -- -- -- -- --
SNY
Sanofi SA
$5.7B $917.8M 6.07% 7.55% 4.64% -$498.5M

Innate Pharma SA vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns IPHA or CLLS?

    Cellectis SA has a net margin of -- compared to Innate Pharma SA's net margin of 46.57%. Innate Pharma SA's return on equity of -72.79% beat Cellectis SA's return on equity of -31.46%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    -- -- $68.9M
    CLLS
    Cellectis SA
    -- $0.08 $179.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About IPHA or CLLS?

    Innate Pharma SA has a consensus price target of $8.02, signalling upside risk potential of 313.4%. On the other hand Cellectis SA has an analysts' consensus of $5.80 which suggests that it could grow by 305.59%. Given that Innate Pharma SA has higher upside potential than Cellectis SA, analysts believe Innate Pharma SA is more attractive than Cellectis SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    1 1 0
    CLLS
    Cellectis SA
    2 1 0
  • Is IPHA or CLLS More Risky?

    Innate Pharma SA has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cellectis SA has a beta of 3.219, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 221.86%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IPHA or CLLS?

    Innate Pharma SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cellectis SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innate Pharma SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cellectis SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IPHA or CLLS?

    Innate Pharma SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cellectis SA quarterly revenues of $12.7M. Innate Pharma SA's net income of -- is lower than Cellectis SA's net income of $5.9M. Notably, Innate Pharma SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cellectis SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innate Pharma SA is 11.60x versus 3.39x for Cellectis SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    11.60x -- -- --
    CLLS
    Cellectis SA
    3.39x -- $12.7M $5.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns IPHA or DBVT?

    DBV Technologies SA has a net margin of -- compared to Innate Pharma SA's net margin of --. Innate Pharma SA's return on equity of -72.79% beat DBV Technologies SA's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    -- -- $68.9M
    DBVT
    DBV Technologies SA
    -- -$1.10 --
  • What do Analysts Say About IPHA or DBVT?

    Innate Pharma SA has a consensus price target of $8.02, signalling upside risk potential of 313.4%. On the other hand DBV Technologies SA has an analysts' consensus of $22.63 which suggests that it could grow by 185.08%. Given that Innate Pharma SA has higher upside potential than DBV Technologies SA, analysts believe Innate Pharma SA is more attractive than DBV Technologies SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    1 1 0
    DBVT
    DBV Technologies SA
    0 0 0
  • Is IPHA or DBVT More Risky?

    Innate Pharma SA has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DBV Technologies SA has a beta of -0.080, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.034%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IPHA or DBVT?

    Innate Pharma SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DBV Technologies SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innate Pharma SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DBV Technologies SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IPHA or DBVT?

    Innate Pharma SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DBV Technologies SA quarterly revenues of --. Innate Pharma SA's net income of -- is lower than DBV Technologies SA's net income of -$23M. Notably, Innate Pharma SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DBV Technologies SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innate Pharma SA is 11.60x versus -- for DBV Technologies SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    11.60x -- -- --
    DBVT
    DBV Technologies SA
    -- -- -- -$23M
  • Which has Higher Returns IPHA or EDAP?

    Edap TMS SA has a net margin of -- compared to Innate Pharma SA's net margin of -9.55%. Innate Pharma SA's return on equity of -72.79% beat Edap TMS SA's return on equity of -39.5%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    -- -- $68.9M
    EDAP
    Edap TMS SA
    44.78% -$0.05 $53.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About IPHA or EDAP?

    Innate Pharma SA has a consensus price target of $8.02, signalling upside risk potential of 313.4%. On the other hand Edap TMS SA has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 548.86%. Given that Edap TMS SA has higher upside potential than Innate Pharma SA, analysts believe Edap TMS SA is more attractive than Innate Pharma SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    1 1 0
    EDAP
    Edap TMS SA
    0 1 0
  • Is IPHA or EDAP More Risky?

    Innate Pharma SA has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edap TMS SA has a beta of 0.124, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.615%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IPHA or EDAP?

    Innate Pharma SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Edap TMS SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innate Pharma SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Edap TMS SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IPHA or EDAP?

    Innate Pharma SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Edap TMS SA quarterly revenues of $21.7M. Innate Pharma SA's net income of -- is lower than Edap TMS SA's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Innate Pharma SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Edap TMS SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innate Pharma SA is 11.60x versus 0.71x for Edap TMS SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    11.60x -- -- --
    EDAP
    Edap TMS SA
    0.71x -- $21.7M -$2.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns IPHA or GNFT?

    Genfit SA has a net margin of -- compared to Innate Pharma SA's net margin of --. Innate Pharma SA's return on equity of -72.79% beat Genfit SA's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    -- -- $68.9M
    GNFT
    Genfit SA
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About IPHA or GNFT?

    Innate Pharma SA has a consensus price target of $8.02, signalling upside risk potential of 313.4%. On the other hand Genfit SA has an analysts' consensus of $10.17 which suggests that it could grow by 200.01%. Given that Innate Pharma SA has higher upside potential than Genfit SA, analysts believe Innate Pharma SA is more attractive than Genfit SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    1 1 0
    GNFT
    Genfit SA
    1 0 0
  • Is IPHA or GNFT More Risky?

    Innate Pharma SA has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genfit SA has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.243%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IPHA or GNFT?

    Innate Pharma SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genfit SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innate Pharma SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genfit SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IPHA or GNFT?

    Innate Pharma SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Genfit SA quarterly revenues of --. Innate Pharma SA's net income of -- is lower than Genfit SA's net income of --. Notably, Innate Pharma SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Genfit SA's PE ratio is 32.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innate Pharma SA is 11.60x versus 5.83x for Genfit SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    11.60x -- -- --
    GNFT
    Genfit SA
    5.83x 32.57x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns IPHA or SNY?

    Sanofi SA has a net margin of -- compared to Innate Pharma SA's net margin of 6.54%. Innate Pharma SA's return on equity of -72.79% beat Sanofi SA's return on equity of 7.55%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    -- -- $68.9M
    SNY
    Sanofi SA
    70.24% $0.29 $97.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About IPHA or SNY?

    Innate Pharma SA has a consensus price target of $8.02, signalling upside risk potential of 313.4%. On the other hand Sanofi SA has an analysts' consensus of $63.97 which suggests that it could grow by 26.52%. Given that Innate Pharma SA has higher upside potential than Sanofi SA, analysts believe Innate Pharma SA is more attractive than Sanofi SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    1 1 0
    SNY
    Sanofi SA
    5 2 0
  • Is IPHA or SNY More Risky?

    Innate Pharma SA has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sanofi SA has a beta of 0.578, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.246%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IPHA or SNY?

    Innate Pharma SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sanofi SA offers a yield of 7.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.04 per share. Innate Pharma SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sanofi SA pays out 84.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Sanofi SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IPHA or SNY?

    Innate Pharma SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sanofi SA quarterly revenues of $8.1B. Innate Pharma SA's net income of -- is lower than Sanofi SA's net income of $531.9M. Notably, Innate Pharma SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sanofi SA's PE ratio is 20.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innate Pharma SA is 11.60x versus 2.64x for Sanofi SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IPHA
    Innate Pharma SA
    11.60x -- -- --
    SNY
    Sanofi SA
    2.64x 20.24x $8.1B $531.9M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Micron a Good Stock to Buy Now?
Is Micron a Good Stock to Buy Now?

Like most of its peers in the semiconductor industry, Micron…

Is Uber Finally on the Path to Consistent Profitability?
Is Uber Finally on the Path to Consistent Profitability?

After posting massive losses quarter after quarter for years, Uber…

How High Will MSTY Go By 2030?
How High Will MSTY Go By 2030?

YieldMax’s MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) is a high-yield…

Stock Ideas

Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x

Sell
42
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.5T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
91
TORXF alert for Apr 17

Torex Gold Resources [TORXF] is down 2.41% over the past day.

Sell
25
BULZ alert for Apr 17

MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innov 3X Levd ETN [BULZ] is down 0.78% over the past day.

Sell
44
VIST alert for Apr 17

Vista Energy SAB de CV [VIST] is up 7.33% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock